Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 21
pro vyhledávání: '"Pernille Gabel"'
Autor:
Petricia Marie Horshauge, Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pia Kirkegaard, Adrian Edwards, Berit Andersen
Publikováno v:
Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol 19, Iss , Pp 101132- (2020)
There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood.The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorecta
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/47f9caca3b2641689ad6c4606b52429e
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0241703 (2020)
BackgroundThe decision to take up colorectal cancer screening has to be made on informed grounds balancing benefits and harms. Self-administered decision aids can support citizens in making an informed choice. A self-administered web-based decision a
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/eae5c3c8382145d8a3bac9ccfa529ac5
Publikováno v:
Trials, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer screening participation is a preference-sensitive choice, in which trade-offs between benefits and harms must be made by individual citizens. Often the decision is made without any contact with healthcare profess
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a6bf59c1afed49bf939022e0846eee86
Autor:
Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pernille Bjørnholt Nielsen, Dorte Brandt Svendstrup, Berit Andersen
Publikováno v:
BMC Health Services Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
Abstract Background Potential barriers to breast cancer screening adherence include patient satisfaction, as well as pain, feeling obliged to participate, and other concerns that might compromise the level of satisfaction. The present study aimed to
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/150e3b2d12fc4457989692366ef463c3
Publikováno v:
Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol 14, Iss , Pp - (2019)
Background: Colorectal cancer screening uptake is associated with knowledge, attitudes and worries about screening. People with higher levels of health literacy usually have higher screening-related knowledge, but its association with attitudes and w
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e0370e6d28ad4e83b0530beb537e4d30
Autor:
Rikke Stokholm, Berit Andersen, Pernille Gabel, Henrik Sehested Laursen, Pia Kirkegaard, Mette Bach Larsen
Publikováno v:
Larsen, M B, Stokholm, R N, Kirkegaard, P, Laursen, H S, Gabel, P J & Andersen, B 2022, ' Making decisions on your own: Self-administered decision aids about colorectal cancer screening : A systematic review and meta-analyses ', Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 534-546 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.035
Objective To provide a systematic review of self-administered decision aids (DAs) for citizens invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening synthesizing the effectiveness of self-administered DAs on informed choice or the components hereof;
Autor:
Pinar Bor, Line Winther Gustafson, Pernille Gabel, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Anne Hammer, Berit Andersen, Henrik Hein Lauridsen, Mette Bach Larsen
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, no. 1, 89 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00982-4
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, 89 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00982-4
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, I P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', B M C Medical Research Methodology .
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, no. 1, 89 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00982-4
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, 89 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00982-4
Gustafson, L W, Gabel, P, Hammer, A, Lauridsen, H H, Petersen, L K, Andersen, B, Bor, I P & Larsen, M B 2020, ' Validity and reliability of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Danish women aged 45 years and older with abnormal cervical screening results ', B M C Medical Research Methodology .
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Background State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale was developed in the 1980’s and has been widely used both in clinical settings and in research. However the Danish version of STAI has not been validated. The aim of this study was to assess the
Publikováno v:
Gabel, P, Larsen, M B, Edwards, A, Kirkegaard, P & Andersen, B 2020, ' Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment : A randomised controlled trial ', PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 11, e0241703 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241703
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0241703 (2020)
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0241703 (2020)
PLoS ONE
Background The decision to take up colorectal cancer screening has to be made on informed grounds balancing benefits and harms. Self-administered decision aids can support citizens in making an informed choice. A self-administered web-based decision
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::340f00d8d02a4e54d1b50e8929fdca6b
https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/effectiveness-of-a-decision-aid-for-colorectal-cancer-screening-on-components-of-informed-choice-according-to-educational-attainment(f1b9fe82-c385-4b6f-993e-29a4b56f5eb5).html
https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/effectiveness-of-a-decision-aid-for-colorectal-cancer-screening-on-components-of-informed-choice-according-to-educational-attainment(f1b9fe82-c385-4b6f-993e-29a4b56f5eb5).html
Publikováno v:
Larsen, M B, Gabel, P & Andersen, B 2017, ' Effectiveness of self-administered decision aids for people invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening : a systematic review protocol ', JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1552-1560 . https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002966
Bach Larsen, M, Gabel, P & Andersen, B 2017, ' Effectiveness of self-Administered decision aids for people invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening : A systematic review protocol ', JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1552-1560 . https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002966
Bach Larsen, M, Gabel, P & Andersen, B 2017, ' Effectiveness of self-Administered decision aids for people invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening : A systematic review protocol ', JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1552-1560 . https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002966
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:: The objective is to assess the effectiveness of self-administered decision aids for people invited to participate in colorectal cancer screening. We will evaluate effects on informed choice, decisional conflict, knowledge,
Publikováno v:
Patient education and counseling. 103(2)
Objectives\ud \ud This trial tested the effectiveness of a self-administered web-based decision aid, targeted at citizens with lower educational attainment, on informed choice about colorectal cancer screening participation as assessed by group level