Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 17
pro vyhledávání: '"Paul F. Rothstein"'
Autor:
Paul F. Rothstein, Ronald J. Coleman
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Paul F. Rothstein, Ronald J. Coleman
Publikováno v:
Texas A&M Law Review. 9:165-208
The Confrontation Clause in the Sixth Amendment affords the “accused” in “criminal prosecutions” the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against” them. A particular challenge for courts over at least the last decade-plus has been t
Autor:
Paul F. Rothstein, Ronald J. Coleman
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Ronald J. Coleman, Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment grants “the accused” in “all criminal prosecutions” a right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” A particular problem occurs when there is a gap in time between the testimony t
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Amici curiae are a group of philosophically and politically diverse law school professors and scholars in the fields of criminal law and mental health from a variety of disciplines who have been teaching and writing about the insanity defense and rel
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Evidentiary presumptions in law act as shortcuts to rigorous proof. By means of an evidentiary presumption, a difficult-to-prove critical fact may be established by proving some other more easily provable subsidiary fact from which the critical fact
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
Law, Probability and Risk. 14:51-66
The 'Doctrine of Chances' is a doctrine of probability that purports to solve an apparent logical conundrum or contradiction in the law of Evidence. On the one hand, the law of Evidence purports to ban evidence which invites the fact-finder to reason
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In the last weeks in June, 2015, as the present term of the U.S. Supreme Court drew to a close, many controversial and important decisions were handed down by the Court. The substance of the decisions has been written about extensively. Two of the de
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In Ohio v. Clark, decided this week, the U.S. Supreme Court held admissible in defendant’s criminal trial for child abuse, a teacher’s testimony that the three-year-old victim, upon being pressed for an answer, told his pre-school teacher that th
Autor:
Paul F Rothstein
Publikováno v:
Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences.