Výsledky vyhledávání - "Paglieri, F."

Fiducia sociale e prevenzione collettiva dei rischi naturali: due studi sperimentali

Autor: Paglieri F., Falcone R., Felletti S., Sapienza A.

Publikováno v: Bollettino di geofisica teorica ed applicata (Testo stamp.) 60 (2019): s23–s35.
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Paglieri F., Falcone R., Felletti S., Sapienza A./titolo:Fiducia sociale e prevenzione collettiva dei rischi naturali: due studi sperimentali/doi:/rivista:Bollettino di geofisica teorica ed applicata (Testo stamp.)/anno:2019/pagina_da:s23/pagina_a:s35/intervallo_pagine:s23–s35/volume:60

In questo contributo presentiamo, a titolo esemplificativo, due dei numerosi studi sperimentali condotti dal gruppo ISTC-CNR all'interno del progetto CLARA, in particolare nell'ambito dell'Obiettivo Realizzativo 2, "Fiducia, percezione del rischio e

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=cnr_________::df319970b24aedc2adbc5c3d60d7c8a5
http://www3.ogs.trieste.it/bgta/provapage.php?id_articolo=826

Zobrazit plný text záznamu

The scaremongering fallacy of fallacy theory: how to improve reasoning without fear of error

Autor: Paglieri F.

Publikováno v: Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods, edited by Gabbay D., Magnani L., Park W., Pietarinen A. V., pp. 79–101. London: College Publications Ltd, 2019
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Paglieri F./titolo:The scaremongering fallacy of fallacy theory: how to improve reasoning without fear of error/titolo_volume:Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods/curatori_volume:Gabbay D., Magnani L., Park W., Pietarinen A. V./editore: /anno:2019

John Woods has made crucial contributions both on how to make sense of the problematic notion of "charity" in argumentation theory, and on how to develop a reasonable theory of argumentative errors, often referred to as "fallacies". In this paper I w

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=cnr_________::23bc8e982aa431c9dd8ef56c8466aee8
https://publications.cnr.it/doc/414374

Zobrazit plný text záznamu

Evidence quality variations and claim acceptance: An experimental investigation of the role of distraction and dilution

Autor: Hornikx, J.M.A., Paglieri, F., Bonelli, L., Felletti, S.

Publikováno v: Paglieri, F.; Bonelli, L.; Felletti, S. (ed.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion, pp. 211-222
Paglieri, F.; Bonelli, L.; Felletti, S. (ed.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion, 211-222. London : College Publications
STARTPAGE=211;ENDPAGE=222;TITLE=Paglieri, F.; Bonelli, L.; Felletti, S. (ed.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion

Item does not contain fulltext

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::77693cf5c33030f649c29882453142de
https://hdl.handle.net/2066/160407

Zobrazit plný text záznamu

Argument technologies: Theory, analysis and applications

Autor: Bex F., Grasso F., Green N., Paglieri F., Reed C.

Publikováno v: London: College Publications Ltd, 2017
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Bex F., Grasso F., Green N., Paglieri F., Reed C./titolo:Argument technologies: Theory, analysis and applications/editore: /anno:2017

Argument technologies started a few decades ago as a sub-field of Artificial Intelligence, in which philosophical theories of arguments were leveraged to handle key computational challenges, such as the modelling of non-monotonic reasoning and the de

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=cnr_________::9680d18b7aadb23bfc94888f8e3c029f
http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/414367

Zobrazit plný text záznamu

Vyhledávací nástroje:

Upřesnit hledání