Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 14
pro vyhledávání: '"Olmo Van den Akker"'
Autor:
Marcus R Munafò, Robert Thibault, Robbie Clark, Olmo van den Akker, Samuel Westwood, Jacqueline M Thompson
Publikováno v:
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 10 (2023)
Objectives Prospectively registering study plans in a permanent time-stamped and publicly accessible document is becoming more common across disciplines and aims to reduce risk of bias and make risk of bias transparent. Selective reporting persists,
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ee3263cb8b8f48feadc5dda1039b0f9e
Autor:
Olmo Van den Akker, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Marjan Bakker, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Tsz Keung Wong, Jelte M. Wicherts
Preregistration has gained traction as one of the most promising solutions to improve the replicability of scientific effects. In this project, we compared 193 psychology studies that earned a Preregistration Challenge prize or Preregistration Badge
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::7baf384769fb914ae8e234207e5457ac
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/fhdbs
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/fhdbs
Autor:
Robbie Cornelis Maria van Aert, Michele B. Nuijten, Anton Olsson-Collentine, Andrea Helena Stoevenbelt, Olmo Van den Akker, Richard Anthony Klein, Jelte M. Wicherts
The COVID-19 outbreak has led to an exponential increase of publications and preprints about the virus, its causes, consequences, and possible cures. COVID-19 research has been conducted under high time pressure and has been subject to financial and
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f84c489266afee2ea88075750a0521aa
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/asbfd
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/asbfd
Autor:
Don van Ravenzwaaij, Marjan Bakker, Remco Heesen, Felipe Romero, Noah N'Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Sophia Crüwell, Sarahanne Field, Chris Hubertus Joseph Hartgerink, Leonhard Held, Marcus Robert Munafo, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Leonid Tiokhin, Vincent Traag, Olmo Van den Akker, Anna Elisabeth van 't Veer, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published findings are false or do not replicate. The current position paper provides a broad perspective on this scientific error, focusing both on reform history
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0f227bf29e7be21b3e3dc3f579660fc1
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wm4v6
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wm4v6
Autor:
Jeffrey J. Starns, Yoram K. Kunkels, Gustav Nilsonne, Balazs Aczel, Felix Holzmeister, Jörg Rieskamp, Andrea M Cataldo, Casper J. Albers, Ben R. Newell, Brian A Nosek, Raphael Silberzahn, Jean-François Mangin, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Gary F. Egan, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Barnabas Szaszi, Matthew J. Salganik, Martin Schweinsberg, Alexander T. Kindel, Niko A. Busch, Daniel J. Simons, Emmanuel Caruyer, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Russell A. Poldrack, Dora Matzke, Noah van Dongen, Anna Dreber, Nelson Cowan, Barbara A. Spellman, Chris Donkin, Gilles Dutilh, Johnny van Doorn, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Marcus R. Munafò, Marcel A.L.M. van Assen, Rink Hoekstra, Juergen Huber, Samuel St-Jean, Laura F. Bringmann, Udo Boehm, Daniel J. Benjamin, Tom Schonberg, Eric Luis Uhlmann, D. Stephen Lindsay, Michael Kirchler, David R. Shanks, Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Kai J. Jonas, Andrew Delios, Olmo van den Akker, Jelte M. Wicherts, Sabine Hoffmann, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Magnus Johannesson
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f2e0e5bf6864bc3b20e122e1d256c9f0
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.72185.sa2
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.72185.sa2
Autor:
Gowri Gopalakrishna, Jelte M. Wicherts, Gerko Vink, Ineke Stoop, Olmo Van den Akker, Gerben ter Riet, Lex Bouter
BackgroundWhile substantial attention has been paid to research misbehaviors, responsible research practices (RRPs) and their potential explanatory factors have not been studied extensively.Methods The National Survey on Research Integrity (NSRI) is
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1bcce8af045f27649fa14366154d3705
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/xsn94
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/xsn94
Autor:
Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, Olmo Van den Akker, Casper J Albers, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Daniel Jacob Benjamin, Udo Boehm, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Laura Francina Bringmann, Niko Busch, Emmanuel Caruyer, Andrea Michael Cataldo, Nelson Cowan, Andrew Delios, Noah N'Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Chris Donkin, Johnny van Doorn, Anna Dreber, Gilles Dutilh, Gary F. Egan, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Rink Hoekstra, Sabine Hoffmann, Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Kai Jonas, Alexander Kindel, Michael Kirchler, Yoram Kevin Kunkels, D. Stephen Lindsay, Jan-Francois Mangin, Dora Matzke, Marcus Robert Munafo, Ben R Newell, Brian A. Nosek, Russell Poldrack, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Jörg Rieskamp, Matthew Salganik, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Tom Schonberg, Martin Schweinsberg, David Shanks, Raphael Silberzahn, Daniel J. Simons, Bobbie Spellman, Jeffrey Joseph Starns, Samuel St-Jean, Eric Luis Uhlmann, Jelte M. Wicherts, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
We present consensus-based guidance for conducting and documenting multi-analyst studies. We discuss why broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach will strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions in empirical sciences.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::036bd612afd89b909127e15c0c55979d
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/5ecnh
https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/5ecnh
Autor:
Anna van 't Veer, Jerome Olsen, Olmo van den Akker, Andrew N. Hall, Rodica Ioana Damian, Bill Chopik, Elliott Kruse, KD Valentine, Stuart J. Ritchie, Marjan Bakker, Sara J. Weston, Jessica E. Kosie, Pamela E. Davis-Kean, Lorne Campbell
Publikováno v:
Meta-Psychology
Meta-psychology
Meta-Psychology, 5. Linnaeus University
Meta-Psychology, 5:2625
Meta-psychology
Meta-Psychology, 5. Linnaeus University
Meta-Psychology, 5:2625
Preregistration has been lauded as one of the solutions to the so-called ‘crisis of confidence’ in the social sciences and has therefore gained popularity in recent years. However, the current guidelines for preregistration have been developed pr
Autor:
Dénes Szűcs, Michèle B. Nuijten, Sophia Crüwell, Tom E Hardwicke, John P. A. Ioannidis, Olmo van den Akker, Robert T. Thibault
Publikováno v:
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). SAGE Publications Inc.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). SAGE Publications Inc.
Replication studies that contradict prior findings may facilitate scientific self-correction by triggering a reappraisal of the original studies; however, the research community’s response to replication results has not been studied systematically.
Publikováno v:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44:e19. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44:e19. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44
Lee and Schwarz interpret meta-analytic research and replication studies as providing evidence for the robustness of cleansing effects. We argue that the currently available evidence is unconvincing because (a) publication bias and the opportunistic