Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 19
pro vyhledávání: '"Oleg Khoma"'
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 42:69-82
The paper determines the status of the “Oral History of Philosophy” within the history of philosophy as a discipline. The author formulates his theses as answers to the fundamental questions Serhii Yosypenko asked in 2019. The latter subjected th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9b41a5a795faabeddd8a404826916cd6
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.069
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent42.01.069
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 41:24-65
The paper aims to prove the hypothesis that Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism is significantly influenced by the Cartesian meditation as a genre of philosophizing. It refutes theses about (1) the non-predicativity of Sextus’ language and about (2)
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1059cc24fae91396241a2d3071343477
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.024
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.02.024
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 41:130-140
Review of Marion, J.-L. (2021). Questions cartésiennes III: Descartes sous le masque du cartésianisme. Paris: PUF.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0f07dcf8654620a2edd24fb1ab9bfca2
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.01.130
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent41.01.130
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 40:6-31
An expert poll of “Sententiae”.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::630e223ac6cb90a151370bdcf9d5650f
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.03.006
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.03.006
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 40:111-114
Review of Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l'urgence d'un retour aux textes. Paris: L'Hrarmattan.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::274e7308298e71d9abdc7105e1fc5501
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.02.111
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.02.111
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 39:170-172
Some terms from Outlines of Pyrrhonism (I: 1-13) are problematic for Ukrainian translation. The commentary justifies the Ukrainian equivalents for those terms, in particular, "uyavlennia" for phantasia (not "vrazhennia"!), "pidvplyvnyi stan" for path
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f2573cd613eb8c3b9e2811ea25e6fee7
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.170
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.170
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 39:207-209
Review of Stetter, J., & Ramond, C. (Eds.). (2019). Spinoza in 21st-century American and French philosophy: metaphysics, philosophy of mind, moral and political philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9ac545f1f447cd1f4fd21e3bd66b7810
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.207
https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.207
Autor:
Xenija Zborovska, Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought). :6-52
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9c9cab5dbb2efe5ecf4002413cec1c57
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.04.006
Publikováno v:
Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought). :124-130
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c70971b75b9a52c42c82adba7d82458c
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.03.124
https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2019.03.124
Autor:
Oleg Khoma
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 36:18-29
The author argues that according to Sextus Empiricus, (a) the "sensual" nature of the phenomenon is a metaphorical notion, since it is indistinguishably extended both to sensuality and thinking; (b) the phenomenon manifest itself with irresistible fo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::fe09f97227cecef0ce6c0fb8631d252c
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.02.018
https://doi.org/10.22240/sent36.02.018