Zobrazeno 1 - 9
of 9
pro vyhledávání: '"Ole Winckler Andersen"'
Publikováno v:
Energy for Sustainable Development. 72:83-87
Publikováno v:
Energy Policy. 175:113496
Publikováno v:
OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers.
This paper clarifies the various definitions of additionality currently in use, and explores the relationship between additionality and key evaluation terms, such as impact and causality. It concludes that additionality should be assessed both ex ant
Autor:
Ole Winckler Andersen, Magdalena Orth, Gunnar Gotz, Erik Lundsgaarde, Irene Basile, Antonie de Kemp
Publikováno v:
OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers.
There is an urgent need to better understand the role that the use of blended finance in development co-operation can play in achieving the SDGs. By adopting the “Blended Finance Principles for Unlocking Commercial Finance for the SDGs” in 2017,
Autor:
Ole Winckler Andersen
Publikováno v:
IDS Bulletin. 45:77-84
A lively methodological debate together with organisational adjustments has dominated the international discussion on development evaluation in the last decade. Less discussed have been the evaluation processes, from procurement of consultants to the
Autor:
Ole Winckler Andersen
Publikováno v:
European Journal of Development Research. 27(3):478-480
Over 30 per cent of development aid is provided to fragile states, and this aid has been followed by a steep increase in the number of evaluations of the interventions – particularly in high-profile settings where aid is being delivered alongside m
Publikováno v:
University of Copenhagen
There is a long-standing debate as to whether nonexperimental estimators of causal effects of social programs can overcome selection bias. Most existing reviews either are inconclusive or point to significant selection biases in nonexperimental studi
Publikováno v:
Journal of Development Effectiveness. 3:1-8
The focus on results in development agencies has led to increased focus on impact evaluation to demonstrate the effectiveness of development programmes. A range of methods are available for counterfactual analysis of infrastructure interventions, as
Knowledge and rigorous evidence around the role of external development partners in situations of conflict and fragility is still lacking. There is little accountability for the billions in aid being spent in places like Afghanistan, Iraq and the Dem