Zobrazeno 1 - 9
of 9
pro vyhledávání: '"Nicolae Dumitrascu"'
Autor:
Chance A. Bell, Nicolae Dumitrascu, Steven J. Sandage, Eugene L. Hall, Peter J. Jankowski, Miriam Waldheter
Publikováno v:
Journal of Psychology and Theology. 50:257-275
Humility is a key virtue in most religious traditions, and empirical evidence links it with healthy religious leader development. Psychological evaluation often forms part of the vocational discernment process for religious leaders. We evaluated deve
Publikováno v:
Spirituality in Clinical Practice. 9:103-113
Autor:
Joni L. Mihura, Callie E. Jowers, Nicolae Dumitrascu, Alicia W. Villanueva van den Hurk, Philip J. Keddy
Publikováno v:
Rorschachiana. 43:25-41
Abstract. Our study addresses the question, “In what settings, with what age groups, and for what purposes is the Rorschach used internationally?” We present preliminary results from 342 Rorschach users representing 36 different countries from a
Autor:
Nicolae Dumitrascu
Publikováno v:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences ISBN: 9783319280998
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6835ae0df0ce62e15b8b5ce59fca0829
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1981
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1981
Publikováno v:
Journal of Personality Assessment. 100:233-249
Recently, psychologists have emphasized the response process-that is, the psychological operations and behaviors that lead to test scores-when designing psychological tests, interpreting their results, and refining their validity. To illustrate the c
Publikováno v:
Psychological Bulletin. 141:250-260
Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015) found our systematic review and meta-analyses of 65 Rorschach variables to be accurate and unbiased, and hence removed their previous recommendation for a moratorium on the applied use of the Rorscha
Autor:
Nicolae Dumitrascu, Joni L. Mihura
Publikováno v:
Rorschachiana. 36:104-106
Publikováno v:
Psychological Bulletin. 139:548-605
We systematically evaluated the peer-reviewed Rorschach validity literature for the 65 main variables in the popular Comprehensive System (CS). Across 53 meta-analyses examining variables against externally assessed criteria (e.g., observer ratings,
Publikováno v:
Journal of personality assessment. 98(4)
We respond to Tibon Czopp and Zeligman's (2016) critique of our systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 65 Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) variables published in Psychological Bulletin (2013). The authors endorsed our supportive findings but crit