Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 14
pro vyhledávání: '"Nesibe Akdemir"'
Publikováno v:
Human Resources for Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Abstract Background Quality of training is determined through programs’ compliance with accreditation standards, often set for a number of years. However, perspectives on quality of training within these standards may differ from the clinicians’
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4539319c359b487d9e52a47877f2dd5a
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Education, Vol 20, Iss S1, Pp 1-6 (2020)
Abstract Background Accreditation systems are based on a number of principles and purposes that vary across jurisdictions. Decision making about accreditation governance suffers from a paucity of evidence. This paper evaluates the pros and cons of co
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1b634cb875434f25b493839ffc3e3b58
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Education, Vol 20, Iss S1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
Abstract Background Accreditation is a key feature of many medical education systems, helping to ensure that programs teach and assess learners according to applicable standards, provide optimal learning environments, and produce professionals who ar
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/d6f10efa54214117b604ebaa43a83804
Autor:
Romana Fattimah Malik, Martina Buljac-Samardžić, Nesibe Akdemir, Carina Hilders, Fedde Scheele
Publikováno v:
BMJ Open Quality, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020)
Introduction A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care st
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4d28f659eda347689092b4d363acaefa
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Education, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
Abstract Background Evaluating the quality of postgraduate medical education (PGME) programs through accreditation is common practice worldwide. Accreditation is shaped by educational quality and quality management. An appropriate accreditation desig
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/6c5a2af5a59d45a1932f5d4af7fece92
Autor:
Theanne Walters, Romana Fattimah Malik, Sarah Taber, Ingrid Philibert, Fedde Scheele, Stanley J. Hamstra, Nesibe Akdemir
Publikováno v:
Akdemir, N, Malik, R F, Walters, T, Taber, S, Hamstra, S J, Philibert, I & Scheele, F 2019, ' Using Gamification to Understand Accreditation in Postgraduate Medical Education ', Journal of graduate medical education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 207-210 . https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00051
Journal of graduate medical education, 11(4), 207-210. University of Finance and Management
J Grad Med Educ
Journal of graduate medical education, 11(4), 207-210. University of Finance and Management
J Grad Med Educ
Publikováno v:
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health, 19(1):75. BioMed Central
Akdemir, N, Malik, R, Walters, T, Hamstra, S & Scheele, F 2021, ' Clinicians’ perspectives on quality : do they match accreditation standards? ', Human Resources for Health, vol. 19, 75, pp. 1-10 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00616-w
Human Resources for Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Human Resources for Health, 19:75, 1-10. BioMed Central
Akdemir, N, Malik, R, Walters, T, Hamstra, S & Scheele, F 2021, ' Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards? ', Human Resources for Health, vol. 19, no. 1, 75 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00616-w
Human Resources for Health, 19(1):75. BioMed Central
Akdemir, N, Malik, R, Walters, T, Hamstra, S & Scheele, F 2021, ' Clinicians’ perspectives on quality : do they match accreditation standards? ', Human Resources for Health, vol. 19, 75, pp. 1-10 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00616-w
Human Resources for Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Human Resources for Health, 19:75, 1-10. BioMed Central
Akdemir, N, Malik, R, Walters, T, Hamstra, S & Scheele, F 2021, ' Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards? ', Human Resources for Health, vol. 19, no. 1, 75 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00616-w
Background Quality of training is determined through programs’ compliance with accreditation standards, often set for a number of years. However, perspectives on quality of training within these standards may differ from the clinicians’ perspecti
Autor:
Nesibe Akdemir, Carina G J M Hilders, Martina Buljac-Samardžić, Romana Fattimah Malik, Fedde Scheele
Publikováno v:
Malik, R F, Buljac-Samard3/4ić, M, Akdemir, N, Hilders, C & Scheele, F 2020, ' What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare ', BMJ Open Quality, vol. 9, no. 1 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826
BMJ Open Quality. BMJ Publishing Group
Malik, R F, Buljac-Samardžić, M, Akdemir, N, Hilders, C & Scheele, F 2020, ' What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare ', BMJ Open Quality, vol. 9, no. 1, e000826 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826
BMJ Open Quality, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020)
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality, 9(1):e000826. BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Open Quality. BMJ Publishing Group
Malik, R F, Buljac-Samardžić, M, Akdemir, N, Hilders, C & Scheele, F 2020, ' What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare ', BMJ Open Quality, vol. 9, no. 1, e000826 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826
BMJ Open Quality, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2020)
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality, 9(1):e000826. BMJ Publishing Group
IntroductionA toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care sti
Publikováno v:
Medical Journal of Australia. 209:249-252
Publikováno v:
BMC medical education, 17(1). BioMed Central
BMC Medical Education, 17(1). BioMed Central
BMC Medical Education
Akdemir, N, Lombarts, K M J M H, Paternotte, E, Schreuder, B & Scheele, F 2017, ' How changing quality management influenced PGME accreditation : a focus on decentralization and quality improvement ', BMC Medical Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 98 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0937-9
BMC Medical Education, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
BMC Medical Education, 17(1). BioMed Central
BMC Medical Education
Akdemir, N, Lombarts, K M J M H, Paternotte, E, Schreuder, B & Scheele, F 2017, ' How changing quality management influenced PGME accreditation : a focus on decentralization and quality improvement ', BMC Medical Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 98 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0937-9
BMC Medical Education, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of postgraduate medical education (PGME) programs through accreditation is common practice worldwide. Accreditation is shaped by educational quality and quality management. An appropriate accreditation design is imp