Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 30
pro vyhledávání: '"Neil W. Williams"'
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
Publikováno v:
Journal of the History of Philosophy. 61:297-323
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b1f6f87debadef21058ac30a4d76413b
https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0023
https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0023
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
Publikováno v:
Pragmatic Reason ISBN: 9781003165699
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::92e6cfa67cc4ef971813d5f19ce79878
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003165699-11
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003165699-11
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
Publikováno v:
Phenomenology and Mind, Iss 3 (2016)
Within much contemporary social ontology there is a particular methodology at work. This methodology takes as a starting point two or more asocial or atomic individuals. These individuals are taken to be perfectly functional agents, though outside of
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/dba983e0df714ec89120bc4eb41fc9e9
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
Publikováno v:
British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 28:209-212
Western philosophy has not been kind to animals. Aristotle held that nonhuman animals were irrational and driven by unthinking appetites. Descartes claimed that animals were biological automata wit...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7352bb285136b84b71586962475deaab
https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1637815
https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1637815
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
Publikováno v:
Contemporary Political Theory. 18:236-239
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::db907cf57ff209ad0dbe54776a2e0674
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0261-0
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0261-0
Autor:
Neil W. Williams, Joe Saunders
Publikováno v:
European journal of philosophy, 2018, Vol.26(4), pp.1269-1282 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Both Kant and James claim to limit the role of knowledge in order to make room for faith. In this paper, we argue that despite some similarities, their attempts to do this come apart. Our main claim is that, although both Kant and James justify our a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4b937f17e2b5ea74948521702990139e
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12319
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12319
Autor:
Neil W. Williams, Robert Stern
Publikováno v:
The Oxford Handbook of William James ISBN: 9780199395699
Although William James formed his philosophical views in direct reaction to the Hegelianism then dominant in American and British institutions, modern critics have tended to reject James’s criticism of G. W. F. Hegel as superficial and outdated. Th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2b4565a02c1b8d822e959cd0d09c1794
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.20
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.20
Autor:
Neil W. Williams
This paper aims to compare the pluralistic theories of James and Locke on the three criteria by which Locke proposes that any pluralistic axiology should be assessed: normativity, objectivity and loyalty. A pluralistic account of value must be able t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::cc0c01f3a2aa7d19efe3fcc3faaa52c4
Publikováno v:
Journal of the History of Philosophy; Oct2023, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p735-738, 4p
Autor:
Gilbert, Jeremie, Soliev, Ilkhom, Robertson, Anne, Vermeylen, Saskia, Williams, Neil W., Grabowski, Robert C.
Publikováno v:
Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal; Jun2023, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p363-377, 15p