Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 123
pro vyhledávání: '"Neil Duxbury"'
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
This short book examines the career and achievements of Lord Kilmuir (David Maxwell Fyfe), a British politician and former Lord Chancellor who is mainly remembered for some poor and unpopular decisions but who nevertheless made a considerable mark on
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
In Elements of Legislation, Neil Duxbury examines the history of English law through the lens of legal philosophy in an effort to draw out the differences between judge-made and enacted law and to explain what courts do with the laws that legislature
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Neil Duxbury examines how precedents constrain legal decision-makers and how legal decision-makers relax and avoid those constraints. There is no single principle or theory which explains the authority of precedent but rather a number of arguments wh
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements that they need not have made had they kept strictly to the task in hand. Why do they do this? The Intricacies of Dicta and Dissent examines two such type
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bf42fc87f98fda1bf616c66fb5e75970
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882590
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882590
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Publikováno v:
Volume: 23, Issue: 1 823-838
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Hans Kelsen, saf hukuk kuramı ile yirminci yüzyıl hukuk felsefesini derinden etkilemiştir. Bu kuramı yaklaşık elli yıl boyunca geliştirip sürdürmüştür.Ancak ömrünün sonuna doğru bu kuramda bazı önemli değişiklikler yapmıştır.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d5199b9f839c277f58f3c77ad2f5c9f0
https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.899934
https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.899934
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8e90c3b62b3ae3d5ba1eafef0ddf2fd2
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871367
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871367
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Constitutional Law. 15:649-670
In this article, I consider judicial disapproval as a form of non-binding review of the constitutionality of legislation. Judicial disapproval is epitomized by the “declaration of incompatibility” – a concept which is commonly thought to have b
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::f67c473b7315d1a1ad9de65b332c29f7
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox051
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox051
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 76:337-359
This article considers prescription as a customary standard of legal validity which enables judges to identify certain customs as law even though the status of those customs as law cannot be ascribed to a law-making authority. Although claims as to c
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0f2c3a465560b91ea26a3165e5a443a4
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197317000253
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197317000253
Autor:
Neil Duxbury, Neil MacCormick
Jerome Frank was a significant contributor to the ‘realist’ movement in US legal theory. He is most closely associated with ‘fact scepticism’, the view that legal processes, especially court processes, are afflicted with pervasive uncertainty
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1a1edb026fccc54561fc69cad8bbb679
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-t031-1
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-t031-1
Autor:
Neil Duxbury
‘Legal realism’ is the term commonly used to characterize various currents of twentieth-century legal thought which stand opposed to idealism. (Hence, ‘realism’ in this context ought to be understood not as a body of thought which opposes nom
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::fa8b9661533c0c068c4ed954928bdca5
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-t009-1
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-t009-1