Zobrazeno 1 - 5
of 5
pro vyhledávání: '"Nanny van Duijn-Bakker"'
Autor:
Trudy van der Weijden, Nanny van Duijn-Bakker, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Hanna Bomhof-Roordink, Arwen H. Pieterse, Fania R. Gärtner
Publikováno v:
Health Expectations, 23(2), 496-508. WILEY
Health Expectations, Vol 23, Iss 2, Pp 496-508 (2020)
Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
Health Expectations, 23(2), 496-508. Wiley
Health Expectations, Vol 23, Iss 2, Pp 496-508 (2020)
Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
Health Expectations, 23(2), 496-508. Wiley
Background Existing measures to assess shared decision making (SDM) have often been developed based on an ill‐defined underlying construct, and many assess physician behaviours only or focus on a single patient‐physician encounter. Objective To (
Publikováno v:
Patient Education and Counseling, 104(3), 571-577. ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Objectives: Shared decision making (SDM) requires an active role from patients, which might be difficult for some. We aimed to identify what patients need to be ready (i.e., well-equipped and enabled) to participate in SDM about treatment, and what p
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1ecb3b9095d10d474235610b084136b5
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3247832
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3247832
Autor:
Maarten J. Fischer, Arwen H. Pieterse, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Hanna Bomhof-Roordink, Nanny van Duijn-Bakker, M. C. M. Baas-Thijssen, Trudy van der Weijden
Publikováno v:
Psycho-Oncology, 28(1), 139-146. Wiley
Psycho-Oncology, 28(1), 139-146
Psycho-Oncology, 28(1), 139-146
Objective To construct a model of shared decision making (SDM) about cancer treatment by conducting an extensive consultation of stakeholders, informed by the literature. Methods We interviewed 76 stakeholders: cancer patients, potential future patie
Autor:
Harm P. Sleeboom, Monique M.E.M. Bos, N.I. Weijl, Koos J. M. van der Hoeven, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Paul K. J. Han, Frans Cluitmans, Ellen M. A. Smets, Patricia Quarles van Ufford-Mannesse, Judith R. Kroep, E. Maartense, F. J. Sherida H. Woei-A-Jin, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes, Nanny van Duijn-Bakker, Ellen G. Engelhardt, Arwen H. Pieterse
Publikováno v:
Medical Decision Making, 37(3), 179-192
Background. Treatment decision making is often guided by evidence-based probabilities, which may be presented to patients during consultations. These probabilities are intrinsically imperfect and embody 2 types of uncertainties: aleatory uncertainty
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::571677c00bf6dc978d81cb1b4d078628
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/115981
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/115981
Autor:
Anne M. Stiggelbout, Nanny van Duijn-Bakker, Ellen G. Engelhardt, Ellen M. A. Smets, Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes, Judith R. Kroep, Arwen H. Pieterse
Publikováno v:
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 54(3), 361-367. Informa Healthcare
STARTPAGE=1;ENDPAGE=7;TITLE=None
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Acta Oncologica, 54(3), 361-367
STARTPAGE=1;ENDPAGE=7;TITLE=None
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Acta Oncologica, 54(3), 361-367
Purpose. Risk prediction models (RPM) in breast cancer quantify survival benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment. These models [e.g. Adjuvant! Online (AO)] are increasingly used during consultations, despite their not being designed for such use. As
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e08847fb05a2558c0900bbe69f7541a0
https://pure.amc.nl/en/publications/breast-cancer-specialists-views-on-and-use-of-risk-prediction-models-in-clinical-practice-a-mixed-methods-approach(63505c12-0dc1-400b-8427-caa4ea66e14d).html
https://pure.amc.nl/en/publications/breast-cancer-specialists-views-on-and-use-of-risk-prediction-models-in-clinical-practice-a-mixed-methods-approach(63505c12-0dc1-400b-8427-caa4ea66e14d).html