Zobrazeno 1 - 7
of 7
pro vyhledávání: '"Mirco Sambrotta"'
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
Studia Semiotyczne, Vol 36, Iss 1 (2022)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.07 The chief purpose of this paper is to advance a defence of the old-fashioned view that empty names are neither proper names nor any other kind of interpretable expressions. A view of this sort usually ma
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a9fe7f9522f647b9990da9cd5d185daf
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
Organon F, Vol 26, Iss 2, Pp 186-206 (2019)
The purpose of this paper is to better understand what ontologists are doing when they ask questions about the categories of the world. I will take Cumpa’s attempts to find out the fundamental structure of the world as a case-study. In one of his l
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/fbc97b75715543a883c774517657e778
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
Studia Semiotyczne, Vol 33, Iss 1 (2019)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxiii1.02 A possible way out to Kripke’s Puzzle About Belief could start from the rejection of the notion of epistemic transparency. Epistemic transparency seems, indeed, irremediably incompatible with an extern
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1160481b2759414ea985cf958eeccbeb
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
American Philosophical Quarterly. 60:1-4
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
THEORIA. 37:257-261
Rectification note to “Scientific models and metalinguistic negotiation” (Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 34(2), 277-295).
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26:781-800
Carnap (1956) famously argued that there are two kinds of questions and claims concerning the existence or reality of entities: internal and external ones. We focus on Carnapian external ontologica...
Autor:
Mirco Sambrotta
Publikováno v:
Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
instname
Digibug. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada
instname
Digibug. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada
The aim of this paper is to explore the possibility that at least some ontological dispute are better understood as what David Plunkett and Timothy Sundell have called ‘metalinguistic negotiations’. I will take the debate between the dominant app
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::bcf2b39e3f1984d5765bb88e7c6d79e9
http://hdl.handle.net/10481/57820
http://hdl.handle.net/10481/57820