Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 75
pro vyhledávání: '"Mark McBride"'
Autor:
Mark McBride
This original collection of jurisprudential essays furthers our understanding of the nature of rights. In Part 1, Halpin considers the value of Hohfeldian neutrality when theorising about law in general, and legal rights in particular, and Kurki focu
Autor:
Mark McBride
How do we know what we know? In this stimulating and rigorous book, Mark McBride explores two sets of issues in contemporary epistemology: the problems that warrant transmission poses for the category of basic knowledge; and the status of conclusive
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 66:39-48
In a fascinating recent debate in the pages of this journal, several legal philosophers have clashed over the very existence and nature of the deontic position of Hohfeldian no-rights. While the debate has many strands, and has become increasingly in
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e9e646fee83d77cc9219c7b9c1afccb8
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auab001
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auab001
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
Without Trimmings ISBN: 0198868863
Matthew Kramer is the preeminent contemporary proponent of the interest theory of rights—according to which rights function to protect the right-holder’s interests. Kramer’s meticulous articulation and refinement of that theory has involved cou
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::13d7a9ef5eae544b5155c61e8bd472ef
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868866.003.0005
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868866.003.0005
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. 33:293-315
In debates over rights, as much as, or perhaps more than, in any philosophical debate, it is important to see the wood from the trees. A little while ago, new life was breathed into debates over rights, as a new candidate theory emerged to rival the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e19a6d54fa73debb04ad51ef5350634c
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.11
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.11
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
Legal Theory. 26:3-39
According to interest theorists of rights, rights function to protect the right-holder's interests. True. But this leaves a lot unsaid. Most saliently here, it is certainly not the case that every agent who stands to benefit from performance of a dut
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7e46c489a96987c1ee3fb1b94ba81621
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325220000026
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325220000026
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
Analytic Philosophy.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b2eb71335439d5b9987eaa32acee7c4a
https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12247
https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12247
Autor:
Mark McBride
Publikováno v:
Ratio Juris. 32:363-389
Scott Shapiro, a prominent defender of exclusive legal positivism—exclusivism—has intriguingly (re)introduced a logical principle, the endorsement and rejection of which he (I take it) supposes can helpfully distinguish exclusivism from its contr
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1dc99e8ce6ae8f3b1752072e03bafaaf
https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12252
https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12252