Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 13
pro vyhledávání: '"Mark Dsouza"'
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
PRAISE FOR THE BOOK“Despite the existing scholarly literature on criminal defences, many issues remain contested or unresolved. Dr Dsouza offers a thorough and scholarly treatment of a complex topic which can be expected to become a point of refere
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
The Modern Law Review. 85:1191-1217
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::81c8005a3e5de3714e98d17b18fffeaa
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12738
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12738
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 73:103-129
The act/omission distinction is widely thought of as being of foundational importance in the substantive criminal law of liberal states. While acts can be proper targets for criminal offences, it is thought that we should only exceptionally criminali
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2f4a74d63cfc2377758cad4665b8ee98
https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73iad1.945
https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73iad1.945
Autor:
David Ormerod, Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
The Insanity Defence ISBN: 0198854943
English law’s insanity defence has been subjected to sustained and cogent criticism. It is outdated in its understanding of psychiatry and was devised for trial procedures that are unrecognizable to those familiar with modern day practice. The defe
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b7a477b32621f0e3557e1558ddd735b7
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854944.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854944.003.0003
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
Jurisprudence. 12:226-235
Although there is much to commend in Sarch's Criminally Ignorant: Why the Law Pretends We Know What We Don't, in this piece, I invite Sarch to expand on his analysis by considering how English doct...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a60d1e59978d8c6ddf4c922c1db92b05
https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.1930370
https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.1930370
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 79:91-119
We use doctrines of identification to explain how corporations may commit criminal offences in their own right, but current versions thereof have several shortcomings. Here, I suggest that reformulating the identification doctrine to treat all corpor
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::dcadbceb76026dc7c86733d70d798d1e
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197320000021
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197320000021
Publikováno v:
Advances in Behavioral Based Safety ISBN: 9789811682698
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9fd571f73e8105b162f0b68a99c153ab
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8270-4_25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8270-4_25
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The doctrine of identification is often used to explain how corporations can commit criminal offences in their own right. Courts identify the natural persons who can be said to personify the corporation, and attribute their conduct and mental states
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0ab38bd36656e88c45e27893d8366c70
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446666
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446666
Autor:
Mark Dsouza
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 75:192-196
IN Collins v Secretary of State [2016] EWHC 33 (Admin), the High Court refused to declare that Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, s. 76(5A) – the so-called “householder's defence” – was incompatible with the right to life enshrined in
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::016a48132ae6b06f088586d3cc38063f
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197316000404
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197316000404