Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 26
pro vyhledávání: '"Mariela Morveli-Espinoza"'
Publikováno v:
Acta Scientiarum: Technology, Vol 41, Iss 1, Pp e37955-e37955 (2019)
In an argumentative dialogue, agents exchange arguments to approve or disapprove a decision alternative. The problem arises when a group of agents with incomplete information needs to reach consensus on the decision. This study proposes a framework f
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/7ef7781f767c44d8a993864e5cfc8b7f
Autor:
Mariela Morveli Espinoza
Publikováno v:
Inteligencia Artificial, Vol 24, Iss 67 (2021)
Rhetorical arguments are used in negotiation dialogues when a proponent agent tries to persuade his opponent to accept a proposal more readily. When more than one argument is generated, the proponent must compare them in order to select the most adeq
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a6cf1a45d7964d9eb0bf4c42595b0593
Publikováno v:
Anais do Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC). :410-421
Em um sistema multi-agente (SMA), é muito comum que os agentes deleguem tarefas uns aos outros. Contudo, devido à subjetividade das informações utilizadas pelos agentes durante o processo de tomada de decisão, um agente pode acabar delegando uma
Publikováno v:
Journal of Logic and Computation.
Explainable Artificial Intelligence systems, including intelligent agents, are expected to explain their internal decisions, behaviors and reasoning that produce their choices to the humans (or to other systems) with which they interact. Given this c
Publikováno v:
Anais do XVIII Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2021).
Algoritmos de aprendizado de caminhos ótimos estão presentes em diversos cenários. Diante disso, o LRTA* (learning real time A*) surge como uma opção que concilia planejamento e ação. O presente artigo estuda como a variação da quantidade de
Publikováno v:
Knowledge and Information Systems. 62:1511-1538
Threats are used in persuasive negotiation dialogues when a proponent agent tries to persuade an opponent of him to accept a proposal. Depending on the information the proponent has modeled about his opponent(s), he may generate more than one threat,
Publikováno v:
IEEE Latin America Transactions. 17:1039-1046
This paper presents a model of dialogue to support the common-knowledge formation in a group of agents which is based on the exchange of arguments supporting or rejecting an issue under discussion and other arguments during the dialogue. In the model
Publikováno v:
Intelligent Systems ISBN: 9783030917012
Argumentation-based persuasive negotiation is a form of negotiation dialogue in which agents, with different interests and goals, exchange proposals that are supported by rhetorical arguments such as threats, rewards, or appeals. Besides rhetorical a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6d7d6157e749f3fcc6deeb4e08653a4c
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91702-9_2
Publikováno v:
BRACIS
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems, including intelligent agents, must be able to explain their internal decisions, behaviours and reasoning that produce their choices to the humans (or other systems) with which they interact. In this
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d1bcb98e0ca5fa34de0835136daff35d
http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05897
http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.05897
Publikováno v:
Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies ISBN: 9783030664114
EUMAS/AT
EUMAS/AT
Rhetorical arguments are used in negotiation dialogues when a proponent agent tries to persuade his opponent to accept a proposal more readily. When more than one argument is generated, the proponent must compare them in order to select the most adeq
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0c3c8a0db535e8035d3a527fba1b61d0
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66412-1_26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66412-1_26