Zobrazeno 1 - 9
of 9
pro vyhledávání: '"Lorenzo Azzano"'
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano, Andrea Raimondi
Publikováno v:
TheoLogica, Vol 7, Iss 2 (2023)
In this paper, we embark on the complicated discussion about the nature of vice in Virtue Ethics through a twofold approach: first, by taking seriously the claim that virtues (and certain flavours of vices) are genuinely dispositional features posses
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/350894a128e84a5a8b23a64c6664212c
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano, Andrea Raimondi
Publikováno v:
Synthese. 200
Autor:
Massimiliano Carrara, Lorenzo Azzano
Publikováno v:
Philosophia. 49:1943-1952
A popular stance amongst philosophers is one according to which, in Lewis’ words, “identity is utterly simple and unproblematic”. Building from Lewis’ famous passage on the matter, we reconstruct, and then criticize, an argument to the conclu
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano
Publikováno v:
Synthese. 199:2949-2976
Discussions about dispositional and categorical properties have become commonplace in metaphysics. Unfortunately, dispositionality and categoricity are disputed notions: usual characterizations are piecemeal and not widely applicable, thus threatenin
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano
Dispositionalism, perhaps the most popular variant of non-Humean metaphysics, submits that dispositions, powers, or capacities, are part of the furniture of the world. In this book I advance an original approach to dispositionalism revolving around t
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano
Publikováno v:
Synthese. 198:4303-4329
Why is it that whenever a structural property (e.g., hydroxide) is instantiated, its constituent properties (e.g., hydrogen) are instantiated as well, by proper parts of the original object? By developing a suggestion from Lewis (Australas J Philos 6
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano
Publikováno v:
Dialectica. 72:309-315
Autor:
Lorenzo Azzano
Publikováno v:
Synthese. 196:329-354
In recent years, a new dispute has risen to prominence: the dispute between realists and anti-realists about causal powers. Albeit sometimes overlooked, the meta-ontological features of this “question of realism for powers” are quite peculiar. Fo