Zobrazeno 1 - 6
of 6
pro vyhledávání: '"Linda McCaughey"'
Publikováno v:
Judgment and Decision Making, Vol 17, Pp 400-424 (2022)
Humans are evidently able to learn contingencies from the co-occurrence of cues and outcomes. But how do humans judge contingencies when observations of cue and outcome are learned on different occasions? The pseudocontingency framework proposes that
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/b9608e05e87f4996909d3cf3601737d1
Publikováno v:
Current Directions in Psychological Science. 32:49-56
The notion of metacognitive myopia refers to a conspicuous weakness of the quality control of memory and reasoning processes. Although people are often remarkably sensitive even to complex samples of information when making evaluative judgments and d
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::06a51a9095556efb747f52e10230cbe1
https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221126906
https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221126906
Autor:
Klaus Fiedler, Linda McCaughey
Publikováno v:
The Psychology of Insecurity ISBN: 9781003317623
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d2d59168e569fd08c3cf4b7ef9abda79
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317623-6
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317623-6
Publikováno v:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 150:1203-1224
Success on many tasks depends on a trade-off between speed and accuracy. In a novel variant, a speed-accuracy trade-off with sample-based decisions in which both speed and accuracy jointly depend on (self-truncated) sample size, we found strong accur
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::865de1a0a773308d64fd4a10b425574c
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000986
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000986
Publikováno v:
The Handbook of Rationality ISBN: 9780262366175
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9fae1c9fdf9f3002eef525b0ecd19331
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11252.003.0015
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11252.003.0015
Publikováno v:
Perspectives on Psychological Science
The current debate about how to improve the quality of psychological science revolves, almost exclusively, around the subordinate level of statistical significance testing. In contrast, research design and strict theorizing, which are superordinate t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0737e068a6bcdfb40b028fbe59095ebd
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33440127
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33440127