Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 17
pro vyhledávání: '"Linda Hamilton Krieger"'
Autor:
Paul Brest, Linda Hamilton Krieger
In Problem Solving, Decision Making, and Professional Judgment, Paul Brest and Linda Hamilton Krieger have written a systematic guide to creative problem solving that prepares students to exercise effective judgment and decision making skills in the
Autor:
Linda Hamilton Krieger
For civil rights lawyers who toiled through the 1980s in the increasingly barren fields of race and sex discrimination law, the approval of the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990 by a nearly unanimous U.S. House and Senate and a Republican Presi
Publikováno v:
A Guide to Civil Procedure ISBN: 9781479805945
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a7536e38a6ab0ebf730393cea92b4064
https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479805945.003.0008
https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479805945.003.0008
Publikováno v:
Law & Society Review. 45:991-1025
A rich theoretical literature describes the disadvantages facing plaintiffs who suffer multiple, or intersecting, axes of discrimination. This article extends extant literature by distinguishing two forms of intersectionality: demographic intersectio
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3c255f0e4c4a5d90857a6aaa3f063a9f
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00463.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00463.x
Autor:
Scott R. Eliason, Catherine R. Albiston, Virginia Mellema, Linda Hamilton Krieger, Lauren B. Edelman
Publikováno v:
American Journal of Sociology. 117:888-954
This article offers a theoretical and empirical analysis of legal endogeneity—a powerful process through which institutionalized organizational structures influence judicial conceptions of compliance with antidiscrimination law. It finds that organ
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::57e3691e28132ddbfafffc3f95d0a7ad
https://doi.org/10.1086/661984
https://doi.org/10.1086/661984
Publikováno v:
Law and Social Inquiry, vol 40, iss 4
Krieger, LH; Best, RK; & Edelman, LB. (2015). When "Best Practices" Win, Employees Lose: Symbolic Compliance and Judicial Inference in Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Cases. Law and Social Inquiry, 40(4), 843-879. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12116. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7c33m9f3
Law & Social Inquiry, vol 40, iss 4
Law and Social Inquiry, vol 40, iss 04
Krieger, LH; Best, RK; & Edelman, LB. (2015). When "best practices" win, employees lose: Symbolic compliance and judicial inference in federal equal employment opportunity cases. Law and Social Inquiry. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12116. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6pb323vc
Krieger, LH; Best, RK; & Edelman, LB. (2015). When "Best Practices" Win, Employees Lose: Symbolic Compliance and Judicial Inference in Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Cases. Law and Social Inquiry, 40(4), 843-879. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12116. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7c33m9f3
Law & Social Inquiry, vol 40, iss 4
Law and Social Inquiry, vol 40, iss 04
Krieger, LH; Best, RK; & Edelman, LB. (2015). When "best practices" win, employees lose: Symbolic compliance and judicial inference in federal equal employment opportunity cases. Law and Social Inquiry. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12116. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6pb323vc
This article provides a new account of employers' advantages over employees in federal employment discrimination cases. We analyze the effects of judicial deference, in which judges use institutionalized employment structures to infer nondiscriminati
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0d1000dcb9b31c5ce84d945aff5e688a
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7c33m9f3
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7c33m9f3
Autor:
Linda Hamilton Krieger
Publikováno v:
Journal of Social Issues. 60:835-848
Courts make use of psychological theories, especially in cases involving discrimination. But the courts do not appear to be cognizant of recent advances in cognitive social psychology. Flawed intuitive psychological models presently limit the law's e
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::769d42d44dfb62448dc37e12503c219b
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00389.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00389.x
Autor:
Linda Hamilton Krieger
Publikováno v:
Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e9a55c38f461ef8dc2af481534781470
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696422.ch21
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696422.ch21
Autor:
Linda Hamilton Krieger
Publikováno v:
Krieger, Linda Hamilton. (2001). Socio-Legal Backlash. Boalt Working Papers in Public Law. UC Berkeley: Berkeley Law. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6xm7d1t2
Over the past three years, an increasing number of disability rights activists, practitioners, and scholarly commentators have claimed that a powerful judicial and media backlash against the Americans with Disabilities Act is underway. Even before is
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ff9442201a20b99e24a426a0ec1ff053
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6xm7d1t2
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6xm7d1t2