Zobrazeno 1 - 6
of 6
pro vyhledávání: '"Lina H. Ingelsrud"'
Autor:
Anna Cronström, Lina H. Ingelsrud, Håkan Nero, L Stefan Lohmander, Majda Misini Ignjatovic, Leif E. Dahlberg, Ali Kiadaliri
Publikováno v:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 100375- (2023)
Objective: Establish proportions of patients reporting important improvement, acceptable symptoms and treatment failure and define interpretation threshold values for pain, patient-reported function and quality-of-life after participating in digital
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4b0516d91a2d420da5f616f5762a9782
Autor:
Lasse K Harris, Anders Troelsen, Berend Terluin, Kirill Gromov, Andrew Price, Lina H Ingelsrud
Publikováno v:
Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 93 (2022)
Background and purpose: Developing meaningful thresholds for the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) advances its clinical use. We determined the minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) values as meanin
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c87b36199a074b59b83dd15a7ba44661
Publikováno v:
Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 92, Iss 1, Pp 85-90 (2020)
Background and purpose — Meaningful interpretation of postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) levels is challenging. We established Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) and Treatment Failure (TF) values for the OKS in patients undergoing primary
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/7a8d10017c0b42e794481ef39b267b9e
Publikováno v:
Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 91, Iss 1, Pp 82-87 (2020)
Background and purpose — Clinical care pathways for knee osteoarthritis (OA) are not always in line with clinical guidelines. We investigated (1) the patient-perceived quality of OA management, (2) which physiotherapist-delivered treatments patient
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/695d0715b6f9449d96f5bfddd92e87ba
Publikováno v:
Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 89, Iss 5, Pp 541-547 (2018)
Background and purpose — Interpreting changes in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) following total knee replacement (TKR) is challenged by the lack of methodologically rigorous methods to estimate minimal important change (MIC
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/52aace8d0818426e863e9aa501005c1f
Autor:
Per Hölmich, Lars Blønd, Niclas Højgaard Eysturoy, Elinborg Mortensen, Hans-Christen Husum, Kristoffer W Barfod, Lina H Ingelsrud
Publikováno v:
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Vol 10, Iss Suppl 1 (2024)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/970f42209336449580dcb95c3911e293