Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 18
pro vyhledávání: '"Lilián Bermejo-Luque"'
An anthology of the most important historical sources, classical and modern, on the subjects of presumptions and burdens of proof In the last fifty years, the study of argumentation has become one of the most exciting intellectual crossroads in the m
Publikováno v:
Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia (2023)
According to political minimalism, a debate is considered political when it revolves around the question “What shall we do?” This account suggests that certain issues related to human enhancement technologies (HETs), which have traditionally been
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/fb1576c5fc5b4460a3920f3a756493e7
Autor:
Fernando Miguel Leal Carretero, Juan Carlos Pereda Failache, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Jean H. M. Wagemans, Bert Meuffels, Lilián Bermejo-Luque, Humberto Marraud González, Luis Vega Reñon, Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez, María G. Navarro, Constanza Inhen Jory, Xavier De Donato Rodríguez, Jesús Zamora Bonilla, Roberto Marafioti, Luisa Puig, Celso López Saavedra, Ana María Vicuña Navarro, Cristóbal Joannon L., Joaquín Galindo Castañeda
El líder indiscutido del programa pragma-dialéctico de investigación es el doctor Frans H. van Eemeren, quien es reconocido como la figura señera de los estudios sobre argumentación en el mundo. No existía hasta ahora una colección de artícul
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo Luque
This book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powe
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque, Andrei Moldovan
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 41, Iss 3 (2021)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c68ae7fa4874485a813c412b8a2a558b
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 40, Iss 3 (2020)
In “Deductivism as an Interpretative Strategy: A Reply to Groarke’s Defense of Reconstructive Deductivism,” David Godden (2005) distinguished two notions of deductivism. On the one hand, as an interpretative thesis, deductivism is the view that
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/29eef2f8072a4fb1a41de7889611e55e
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 39, Iss 2 (2019)
I argue that conductions are a special type of inference indeed, but that this does not mean that we need to develop novel standards of inference goodness or specific argument schemes for properly assessing them. Following LNMA’s theoretical framew
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4572f711046c4f5a851c99c36961d931
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 36, Iss 1, Pp 1-25 (2016)
I argue for the distinction between presuming that p and maintaining that presumably p. In order to make sense of this distinction, I defend a non-inferentialist conception of presumptions and offer an account of the correctness conditions for both p
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/cbbefa0c8dac4209b5a34d985d263ed5
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 34, Iss 3, Pp 311-336 (2014)
a recent paper, Fábio Perin Shecaira (2013) proposes a defence of Waller’s deductivist schema for moral analogical argumentation. This defence has several flaws, the most important of them being that many good analogical arguments would be deemed
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/951a42c85c7d474cb8179892df33e3a6
Autor:
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 32, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2012)
Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a general unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments. This schema is able to explain why certain analogical arguments can be said to b
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/88b03cce98b04666b49f330fb6f6cc4d