Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 22
pro vyhledávání: '"Liana C. Peter-Hagene"'
Publikováno v:
The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law ISBN: 0197649130
When trials include emotionally evocative evidence such as gruesome photographs and victim impact statements, maintaining the balance between probative value and prejudicial effects can be difficult. Such evidence can rouse jurors’ anger, disgust,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4183129af4a3d8e69a02cb8fc57ccac2
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.42
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.42
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 9, p e0183580 (2017)
To investigate dual-process persuasion theories in the context of group decision making, we studied low and high need-for-cognition (NFC) participants within a mock trial study. Participants considered plaintiff and defense expert scientific testimon
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/da5795bea2f7409ba52baf06d6835c5f
Publikováno v:
Psychiatr Psychol Law
In a mock-trial study, jurors read evidence about a doctor who had killed a terminally ill patient at the patient's request. We tested whether instructing jurors about jury nullification (ie jurors' power to return a not-guilty verdict even when lega
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0a4b7a621c9673b95c9b6db30c2a75f5
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34552378
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34552378
Autor:
Kelly C. Burke, Kajal Sachdev, Liana C. Peter-Hagene, Sankhya Amaravadi, Bette L. Bottoms, Kaitlynn S. Richardson, Brandon Garcia, Tayler M. Jones
Publikováno v:
The Humanistic Psychologist.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e6f2ef1562e3d48f6a3f49f60783489c
https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000247
https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000247
Autor:
Kelly C. Burke, Kari L. Nysse Carris, Liana C. Peter-Hagene, Andrew R. A. Conway, Bette L. Bottoms
Publikováno v:
International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice. 2:255-285
Children’s ability to identify perpetrators who are strangers is crucial. Both failures to identify actual perpetrators and false accusations have serious costs for children’s personal security and wellbeing or for innocent suspects. In the curre
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1353dfa380241d5a8fcde32d84ae5bf6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00028-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00028-3
Publikováno v:
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 22:57-79
Expressing anger can signal that someone is certain and competent, thereby increasing their social influence—but does this strategy work for everyone? After assessing gender- and race-based emotion stereotypes (Study 1), we assessed the effect of e
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::fd372aac98de61c253d4e52d0f7f32a4
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702967
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702967
Autor:
Liana C. Peter-Hagene
Publikováno v:
Law and human behavior. 43(3)
Racial diversity in juries, meant to ensure representation of minority voices, can also reduce racial bias in verdicts and improve group performance during deliberation (Sommers, 2006). Although jury diversity might increase cognitive depletion becau
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3b06b11a0ec4428c61b668ab56a28fe7
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31120276
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31120276
Publikováno v:
Law and Human Behavior. 39:581-592
We investigated whether expressing anger increases social influence for men, but diminishes social influence for women, during group deliberation. In a deception paradigm, participants believed they were engaged in a computer-mediated mock jury delib
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2382914939aec70739523513220df692
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000147
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000147
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 9, p e0183580 (2017)
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 9, p e0183580 (2017)
To investigate dual-process persuasion theories in the context of group decision making, we studied low and high need-for-cognition (NFC) participants within a mock trial study. Participants considered plaintiff and defense expert scientific testimon
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::abbc66ea0feed602d628c7c50ce81d16
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5606931
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5606931