Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 14
pro vyhledávání: '"Kunimasa, Sato"'
Autor:
Kunimasa Sato
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 35, Iss 2, Pp 204-220 (2015)
The fostering of rationality has long been endorsed as an educational ideal by some philosophers; in recent years, whereas some have argued for this ideal, others have challenged it, particularly within debates relevant to the study of critical think
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/276c41c4c7bd4664a9bd48d42574b997
Autor:
Kunimasa Sato
Publikováno v:
Episteme. 20:181-194
This study explores a liberatory epistemic virtue that is suitable for good learning as a form of liberating socially situated epistemic agents toward ideal virtuousness. First, I demonstrate that the weak neutralization of epistemically bad stereoty
Autor:
Yoko, Murakawa, Takeshi, Yamamoto, Isao, Taguchi, Keiko, Sato, Kunimasa, Sato, Takashige, Otsuki, Yuko, Ueno, Keiji, Inomata, Osamu, Takahashi
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学総合地域研究 : 敬愛大学総合地域研究所紀要 = Comprehensive area studies : annual bulletin of the Keiai Institute for Area Studies. 9:69-78
Autor:
Kunimasa Sato
Publikováno v:
Metaphilosophy. 50:190-194
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学総合地域研究 : 敬愛大学総合地域研究所紀要 = Comprehensive area studies : annual bulletin of the Keiai Institute for Area Studies. 8:125-133
Autor:
Gilgen, Nora, Tomoyo, Takagi, Hideki, Takaoka, Kunimasa, Sato, Tadashi, Watari, Kai, Seino, Nora, Gilgen
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学総合地域研究 : 敬愛大学総合地域研究所紀要 = Comprehensive area studies : annual bulletin of the Keiai Institute for Area Studies. 7:141-166
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学総合地域研究 : 敬愛大学総合地域研究所紀要 = Comprehensive area studies : annual bulletin of the Keiai Institute for Area Studies. 7:133-139
Autor:
Kunimasa, Sato
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学総合地域研究 : 敬愛大学総合地域研究所紀要 = Comprehensive area studies : annual bulletin of the Keiai Institute for Area Studies. 7:67-76
Autor:
Kunimasa, Sato
Publikováno v:
敬愛大学国際研究 = The Keiai Journal of International Studies. 30:15-23
Autor:
Kunimasa Sato
Publikováno v:
Episteme. 13:329-341
This paper argues for a virtue-based account of questioning. First, it delineates the unreflective yet rational aspects of questioning and demonstrates that “good” questions – that is, properly focused, pertinent questions – can be obtained n