Analogical reasoning and the third layer of the rule of law

Autor: Kloosterhuis, H., Smith, C.E., Garssen, B., Godden, D., Mitchell, G.R., Wagemans, J.H.M.

Publikováno v: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 662-668
STARTPAGE=662;ENDPAGE=668;TITLE=Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 662-668. Amsterdam: Sic Sat

This article discusses two perspectives on interpretative argumentation and the connection with the two conceptions of the Rule of Law. First, we will sketch the formal position and we will demonstrate how interpretative argumentation is to be analyz

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::0a7540b9ac5f36babdcd2f7ee14bce9e
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3210238

Four Fallacies about Analogical Reasoning and the Rule of Law

Autor: Kloosterhuis, Harm, Smith, CE, Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, J., Smith, C.

Publikováno v: Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, 99-109
STARTPAGE=99;ENDPAGE=109;TITLE=Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law

Analogical reasoning is as much contested as it is acclaimed as a tool of legal interpretation to ascertain the ideals of the Rule of Law. It is rejected because it would be infinitely malleable or just a form of deduction from rules. It is defended

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::d5d2557ce07cd888b29dc1417e29e5d7
https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/3e0f0b7d-d5c1-49fc-b9fd-0ad74d1fcc30

Argumentative Contributions to the Settlement of Conflicts in Administrative Judicial Decisions

Autor: Plug, H.J., Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H., Smith, C.E.

Publikováno v: Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, 171-182
STARTPAGE=171;ENDPAGE=182;TITLE=Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::f625d0ddcdee516390313c40bb869295
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/argumentative-contributions-to-the-settlement-of-conflicts-in-administrative-judicial-decisions(fc018637-3529-48af-8ba3-9b1087e1d734).html

Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law: Rule of Law as Argument for Interference

Autor: Muntjewerff, A.J., van Loo, K., Feteris, E.T, Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H.J., Smith, C.E.

Publikováno v: Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, 133-145
STARTPAGE=133;ENDPAGE=145;TITLE=Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::fe6fbfd5275ea45c24aa5e826e24d277
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/fundamental-rights-and-the-rule-of-law(0e464ec7-0ebb-454f-920a-f59e5e44ccd8).html

Argumentatie in een pluralistisch rechtssysteem. De uitdaging voor de Europese hoven

Autor: Gerards, J.H., Feteris, E.T., Kloosterhuis, H.

Publikováno v: Feteris, E.T.; Kloosterhuis, H. (ed.), Gewogen oordelen. Essays over argumentatie en recht. Bijdragen aan het zesde symposium juridische argumentatie 24 juni 2011, 21-40. Den Haag : Boom Juridische uitgevers
STARTPAGE=21;ENDPAGE=40;TITLE=Feteris, E.T.; Kloosterhuis, H. (ed.), Gewogen oordelen. Essays over argumentatie en recht. Bijdragen aan het zesde symposium juridische argumentatie 24 juni 2011
Feteris, E.T.; Kloosterhuis, H. (ed.), Gewogen oordelen. Essays over argumentatie en recht. Bijdragen aan het zesde symposium juridische argumentatie 24 juni 2011, pp. 21-40

Item does not contain fulltext

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::e920a6a6b24ad1693a7a86cd16d0b846
https://hdl.handle.net/2066/106574