Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"Klaudia Kaluzinska"'
Autor:
Mateusz J. Swierz, Dawid Storman, Joanna Zajac, Magdalena Koperny, Paulina Weglarz, Wojciech Staskiewicz, Magdalena Gorecka, Anna Skuza, Adam Wach, Klaudia Kaluzinska, Justyna Bochenek-Cibor, Bradley C. Johnston, Malgorzata M. Bala
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Abstract Background AMSTAR-2 (‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2’) and ROBIS (‘Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews’) are independent instruments used to assess the quality of conduct of systematic reviews/meta-analyses
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/37958f4bd84c4fbdae0687fd3e0eff10
Autor:
Dawid Storman, Magdalena Koperny, Joanna Zając, Maciej Polak, Paulina Weglarz, Justyna Bochenek-Cibor, Mateusz J. Swierz, Wojciech Staskiewicz, Magdalena Gorecka, Anna Skuza, Adam A. Wach, Klaudia Kaluzinska, Małgorzata M. Bała
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 19, Iss 506, p 506 (2022)
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 19; Issue 1; Pages: 506
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 19, Iss 506, p 506 (2022)
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 19; Issue 1; Pages: 506
Systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are considered a reliable source of information in healthcare. We aimed to explore the association of several characteristics of SR/MAs addressing nutrition in cancer prevention and their quality/risk of bias
Autor:
Joanna F Zajac, Dawid Storman, Mateusz J Swierz, Magdalena Koperny, Paulina Weglarz, Wojciech Staskiewicz, Magdalena Gorecka, Anna Skuza, Adam Wach, Klaudia Kaluzinska, Justyna Bochenek-Cibor, Bradley C Johnston, Malgorzata M Bala
Publikováno v:
Nutrition reviews. 80(6)
Context The last 30 years have yielded a vast number of systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses addressing the link between nutrition and cancer risk. Objective The aim of this survey was to assess overall quality and potential for risk of bias in sy
Autor:
Mateusz J Swierz, Wojciech Staskiewicz, Magdalena Gorecka, Magdalena Koperny, Malgorzata M Bala, Anna Skuza, Justyna Bochenek-Cibor, Dawid Storman, Joanna Zajac, Bradley C. Johnston, Paulina Weglarz, Adam Wach, Klaudia Kaluzinska
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Background AMSTAR-2 (‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2’) and ROBIS (‘Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews’) are independent instruments used to assess the quality of conduct of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs)
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::00e5010e10abcdd92b7c75ffc7abd053
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/285361
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/285361