Zobrazeno 1 - 5
of 5
pro vyhledávání: '"Kelsey Ichikawa"'
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254090 (2021)
To those involved in discussions about rigor, reproducibility, and replication in science, conversation about the "reproducibility crisis" appear ill-structured. Seemingly very different issues concerning the purity of reagents, accessibility of comp
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/9329c4334ce34927a155d1bc584aabf1
Publikováno v:
Review of General Psychology. 26:184-198
This article outlines what we call the “narrative of psychology exceptionalism” in commentaries on the replication crisis: many thoughtful commentaries link the current crisis to the specificity of psychology’s history, methods, and subject mat
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::574beb6b858dee0463dfa7519e8f12e5
https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046508
https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046508
Autor:
Helen Zhao, Marina DiMarco, Kelsey Ichikawa, Marion Boulicault, Meg Perret, Kai Jillson, Alexandra Fair, Kai DeJesus, Sarah S. Richardson
Publikováno v:
Social Studies of Science. :030631272311683
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) 2013 decision to lower recommended Ambien dosing for women has been widely cited as a hallmark example of the importance of sex differences in biomedicine. Using regulatory documents, scientific publica
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8bb1963fe48e758130fe41200846e3df
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231168371
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231168371
Autor:
Maayan Sudai, Alexander Borsa, Kelsey Ichikawa, Heather Shattuck-Heidorn, Helen Zhao, Sarah S. Richardson
Publikováno v:
Science (New York, N.Y.). 376(6595)
Researchers should be aware of how sex-difference science is (mis)applied in legal and policy contexts
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e47d4a215a9d6b2cc9a4132d53dbc3ee
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35587987
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35587987
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254090 (2021)
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254090 (2021)
To those involved in discussions about rigor, reproducibility, and replication in science, conversation about the “reproducibility crisis” appear ill-structured. Seemingly very different issues concerning the purity of reagents, accessibility of
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::962c0c1a5b0a154307bc5e97cc5ee64d
https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/sbv3q
https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/sbv3q
