Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 303
pro vyhledávání: '"Kelley M. King"'
Autor:
Recchiuti, John Louis
Publikováno v:
History of Education Quarterly, 2011 Nov 01. 51(4), 573-576.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41303906
Autor:
McArthur, Judith N.
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Southern History, 2011 Nov 01. 77(4), 1025-1026.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41305752
Autor:
Montgomery, Rebecca
Publikováno v:
The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 2011 Jul 01. 115(1), 97-99.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23059604
Autor:
John Louis Recchiuti
Publikováno v:
History of Education Quarterly. 51:573-576
Autor:
Kelley M. King, Noelle A. Paufler
Publikováno v:
Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 28, Iss 0 (2020)
The purpose of this paper is to begin to excavate the unstated theoretical underpinnings of teacher evaluation systems as they exist in policy and practice and to explicitly consider how these evaluation systems might intersect theoretically with soc
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ba3a586982ed4a7593745a5cf97bac80
Publikováno v:
Journal of Transformative Education. 20:138-158
This case study addressed effects of international student teaching on U.S. teacher candidates’ cross-cultural adaptability and perspectives on language, culture, and schooling. Interviews and the Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory were collecte
Publikováno v:
Journal of Educational Supervision. 3:32-50
Autor:
Kelley M. King
Publikováno v:
Journal of Philosophy of Education. 52:330-344
Autor:
Kelley M. King, Miriam D. Ezzani
Publikováno v:
Journal of Educational Administration and History. 50:113-129
While case studies have documented how teachers can either ameliorate or exacerbate situations of ignorance or hate in the classroom toward Muslim students, the role of educational leaders in U.S. ...
Publikováno v:
Studies in Educational Evaluation. 65:100873
International recognition of the teacher’s role in student learning has increased attention to teacher quality and evaluation. In the U.S., policy has relaxed requirements for using student outcomes and granted more flexibility to evaluate teachers