Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 10
pro vyhledávání: '"Katie L. Gibson"'
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
A rhetorical analysis of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's feminist jurisprudence Ruth Bader Ginsburg's lifelong effort to reshape the language of American law has had profound consequences: she has shifted the rhetorical boundaries of jurisprudence on a
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Women's Studies in Communication. 44:518-541
In 2018, 156 survivors took over a small courtroom in Lansing, Michigan, to deliver victim impact statements at the sentencing hearing of Larry Nassar. This article argues that the survivors collec...
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Quarterly Journal of Speech. 105:319-340
Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt was the most important abortion case to come before the United States Supreme Court in 25 years. It was also the first time that three women were seated ...
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson, Amy L. Heyse
Publikováno v:
Western Journal of Communication. 78:97-117
This essay analyzes a chapter from Sarah Palin's best-selling book America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag. We argue that Sarah Palin draws upon the mythology of the American frontier in “The Rise of the Mama Grizzlies” in order
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Women's Studies in Communication. 35:123-137
This article examines Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart to argue that her feminist jurisprudence challenges the rhetorical genre of judicial opinion. Ginsburg's dissent undermines the rhetorical commitments to ne
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson, Amy L. Heyse
Publikováno v:
Communication Quarterly. 58:235-256
Despite the presence of the first woman on the Republican national ticket, this article argues that the rhetoric of the 2008 Republican National Convention (RNC) followed traditional gender scripts to celebrate hegemonic masculinity and denigrate the
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Southern Communication Journal. 73:312-331
An examination of the rhetoric of the Court's majority opinion in Roe v. Wade shows that, in contrast to the public meaning of Roe's ruling as a second wave feminist victory, Roe's rhetoric denied women agency and undermined their judgments and their
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Western Journal of Communication. 71:159-175
This article examines the rhetoric of the Court's majority opinion in the 1908 case of Muller v. Oregon. The Court's opinion is shaped by a Darwinian framework that provides an up-to-date sanction for the logic of separate spheres and marks a secular
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Women's Studies in Communication. 29:133-164
This paper examines the rhetoric of the Court's opinions in United States v. Virginia. The majority opinion is shaped by a framework of progress that acts as a conservative warrant for a politically liberal conceptualization of women. A competing fra
Autor:
Katie L. Gibson
Publikováno v:
Rhetoric & Public Affairs. 10:149-151