Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 52
pro vyhledávání: '"K. Danner Clouser"'
Autor:
K. Danner Clouser
Publikováno v:
Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine ISBN: 9780520317130
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6f2d7318b3e66eac27da504ab73eb911
https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2430677.5
https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2430677.5
Publikováno v:
Physician Assisted Suicide ISBN: 9781315811369
Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) killing a patient voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and allowing a patient to die voluntary passive euthanasia (VPE) are quite distinct from one another conceptually and morally. Two tasks are necessary in order to de
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2104906ea08ec687567330b1161e6732
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315811369-16
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315811369-16
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 25:308-322
In his article 'Specifying, balancing and interpreting bioethical principles' (Richardson, 2000), Henry Richardson claims that the two dominant theories in bioethics--principlism, put forward by Beauchamp and Childress in Principles of Bioethics, and
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::07f24025e1d7d369e241bd959bea1147
https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3
https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3
Autor:
K. Danner Clouser
Publikováno v:
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 5:219-236
Unlike the principles of Kant, Mill, and Rawls, those of principlism are not action guides that stem from an underlying, integrated moral theory. Hence problems arise in reconciling the principles with each other and, indeed, in interpreting them as
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3b99e428b2f5b7fc0e85f600b86fe2ff
https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0166
https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0166
This chapter provides a definition of “death” that accurately describes the way “death” and “dead” are used in both medicine and in everyday conversation. It discusses the characteristics of optimum criteria and tests, and shows how accep
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::89d644860d5541fd3e37f62b43c33ae5
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0011
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0011
Publikováno v:
Bioethics
This chapter discusses the four features of paternalism: (1) benefits the patient, (2) needs moral justification, (3) does not have patient’s consent, and (4) the patient believes he can make his own decision, showing why accounts that leave out an
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::00ef6b041ac621a8f0e558b82f74e256
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0010
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0010
Publikováno v:
Bioethics ISBN: 0195159063
This chapter introduces the technical term “malady” as a genus term that includes as species: diseases, disorders, injuries, allergies, illnesses, etc., and can be taken as meaning that something is wrong with the person. It provides a definition
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::27c622620f58c97933201b1965c110c7
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0006
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0006
Publikováno v:
Bioethics ISBN: 0195159063
This chapter discusses why euthanasia presents a moral dilemma for physicians. It shows that trying to distinguish between active and passive euthanasia in any of the following four ways: (1) acts versus omissions, (2) withholding versus withdrawing,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0d7521da31170250271202551cc1b770
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0012
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0012
BIOETHICS: A Systematic Approach is an extensive revision of Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. The subtitle has changed in order to emphasize that what distinguishes the authors’ approach to bioethics from almost all others is that it is systema
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b39fdf30759b232114dc0b73d628bf98
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.001.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.001.0001
Publikováno v:
Bioethics ISBN: 0195159063
This chapter challenges the view that every moral question has a unique correct answer. The sources of unresolvable moral disagreement are the following four differences: (1) in the rankings of the goods (benefits) and evils (harms); (2) in estimates
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b302ddcd6132f3d1cf95f85089ea90ec
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195159063.003.0003