Zobrazeno 1 - 6
of 6
pro vyhledávání: '"Juliette Robichez"'
Publikováno v:
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 51-80 (2016)
In 1948, Brazil placed itself at the margin of the most important international tribunal of the moment by not adhering to the mandatory jurisdiction clause set out in Article 36-2 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The centra
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/b1f2671433034a7f80464d64dfd49582
Autor:
Juliette Robichez
Publikováno v:
Revista de Direito Internacional. 17
Hoje, existe um consenso com o propósito de reconhecer que ataques contra os bens culturais do inimigo são perniciosos, pois ferem diretamente a essência da dignidade da pessoa humana. Se existe hoje um consenso sobre a necessidade de reservar um
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5723b7e1d33b30dabdd695fb211e072c
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i3.6591
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i3.6591
Publikováno v:
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 65, n. 2 (2020); 149-176
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
Os atos de terrorismo constituem um fenômeno global que tem impacto nas questões de paz e de segurança, nacional e internacionalmente. A criação do Tribunal Penal Internacional se deve aos esforços de diversos Estados para instituir um órgão
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::850ba58bbda03764b981a8105214b6db
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/69797
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/69797
Autor:
Juliette Robichez
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Law and Society. 4:280
In 1948, by not renovating its signature to the mandatory jurisdiction clause set out in Article 36 §2 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Brazil placed itself at the margin of the most important international tribunal nowada
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::dc1e5e4a061aeefc176b388d85095cde
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210404.16
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210404.16
Publikováno v:
Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI. 9:51-80
In 1948, Brazil placed itself at the margin of the most important international tribunal of the moment by not adhering to the mandatory jurisdiction clause set out in Article 36-2 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The centra
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f440ff3cfe727d7814bad0f5f2325620
https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.02
https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.02
Publikováno v:
ACDI-Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional; Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI; 51-80
Annuaire Colombien de Droit International-ACDI; Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI; 51-80
Colombian Yearbook of International Law-CYIL; Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI; 51-80
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 51-80 (2016)
Annuaire Colombien de Droit International-ACDI; Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI; 51-80
Colombian Yearbook of International Law-CYIL; Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI; 51-80
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 51-80 (2016)
En 1948, Brasil se colocó al margen del más importante tribunal internacional del momento al no adherirse a la cláusula de jurisdicción obligatoria prevista en el artículo 36-2 del Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia (cij). El objetiv
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::be310e583b530069a32987167bb3c623
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/15666
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/15666