Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 19
pro vyhledávání: '"Ju Yoen Lee"'
Autor:
Dae Un Hong, Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Science Editing, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 62-72 (2024)
This article explores the challenges related to copyright policies in the context of science and engineering open access (OA) journals based in Korea. The English-language science and engineering OA journals published independently by Korean academic
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/cc413b01985f48e9a3bd99cdd72c98ca
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Science Editing, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 7-12 (2023)
At the end of 2022, the appearance of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot with amazing writing ability, caused a great sensation in academia. The chatbot turned out to be very capable, but also capable of deception, and the news broke th
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/aa89c518bf38454095982480614d0cba
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Science Editing, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 98-103 (2021)
Research and publication misconduct may occur in various forms, including author misrepresentation, plagiarism, and data fabrication. Research and publication ethics are essentially not legal duties, but ethical obligations. In reality, however, lega
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/865dabe767614a999a33b7c8d13a6717
Publikováno v:
Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers - A. 47:229-236
Autor:
Ju-Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
The Justice. 194:238-283
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Korea Private International Law Journal. 28:259-299
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Korea Private International Law Journal. 28:197-242
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee, Dae Un Hong
Publikováno v:
Culture, Meida, and Entertainment Laws. 15:65-126
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
China and WTO Review. 7:211-222
In 2019, two court rulings in China on the issue of copyrightability of AI creations received international attention. It was reported that in Feilin v. Baidu, known as the first AI case, the Beijing Internet Court denied copyright of AI creations, w
Autor:
Ju Yoen Lee
Publikováno v:
Journal of Civil Judgment Enforcement Law. 16:449-535