Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 37
pro vyhledávání: '"José Luis Luján"'
Autor:
Oliver Todt, José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
Salud Pública de México, Vol 58, Iss 3, Pp 393-398 (2016)
Objective. To identify the various types of evidence, as well as their relative importance in European health claims regulation, in order to analyze the consequences for consumer protection of the requirements for scientific substantiation in this re
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/9351f58b4e8548449e2a5e813f5938db
Autor:
José Luis Luján, Oliver Todt
Publikováno v:
Philosophia Scientiæ, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 45-56 (2015)
The debate on the role of values in science has also cropped up in the applied science and, particularly, regulatory science. We propose an analysis, from the perspective of values, of the recent controversies related to the role of scientific knowle
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c685e438f14647e682e1d8557e1931eb
Autor:
José Luis Luján, Oliver Todt
Publikováno v:
Theoria, Vol 23, Iss 3, Pp 307-317 (2009)
En este trabajo analizamos una de las propuestas recientes que defienden modificaciones metodológicas en la evaluación de riesgos respecto a los estándares de prueba: el enfoque basado en el peso de las pruebas (weight of evidence). Este enfoque p
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f8c20cb942964f97bbc951f2a7d7dd6b
Autor:
José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
Isegoría, Iss 12, Pp 172-180 (1995)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ac616cbef552454597cc9276a08cab28
Publikováno v:
Política y Sociedad, Vol 40, Iss 3 (2003)
Underlying social debates and academic analyses about the social effects of technological change, as well as proposals for the management of technological change, a controversy about the social dimension of technology can be identified. This controve
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1e23e9493548483ea25e92038d61b627
Autor:
Oliver Todt, José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
Journal of Risk Research. 24:1532-1543
This paper presents an analysis of the underlying assumptions and choices of the European regulatory process for health claims. The latter are scientifically substantiated statements, usually in th...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::02fcb724fdef4d4df4c3ea1fa01ce0ae
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1873825
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1873825
Autor:
José Luis Luján, Roberto López Mas
Publikováno v:
International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 73(2)
This paper analyzes the way in which the EFSA has addressed the limitations that the essentiality of nutrients presents to the requirement of obtaining evidence from RCTs for the scientific substantiation of health claims. By redefining the requireme
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::68e68b460e4f9462fdd93b5a219cadc0
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34225529
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34225529
Autor:
Oliver Todt, José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
Risk Analysis. 37:958-968
This article analyzes the debate about data acquisition and assessment in health claims regulation by identifying the underlying controversies on methodological choice. Regulation in the European Union imposes the need for a scientific substantiation
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::47aae22896a94d924690967ea89e3fcf
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12665
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12665
Autor:
Oliver Todt, José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
EMBO reports. 19:194-196
Regulatory decision‐making often faces the question of what is an appropriate level of evidence. For instance, which approach is better suited to regulate potentially toxic chemicals: obtaining the best—most complete, most accurate, and so on—i
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2d0968a24f665d71c479383618cd5a26
https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744795
https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744795
Autor:
John Nnaji, José Luis Luján
Publikováno v:
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 30:99-109
The issue of internalism and externalism in historiography of science was intensely debated two decades ago. The conclusions of such debate on the ‘context of science’ appear to be a reinstatement of the positivist view of the ‘content of scien
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4c96f6c72d89ccef94587d99ba7f1e34
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2016.1265864
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2016.1265864