Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 82
pro vyhledávání: '"John M. Doris"'
Publikováno v:
Philosophia Scientiæ, Vol 28, Iss 2, Pp 53-89 (2024)
Numerous commentaries on the Milgram experiments entertain versions of the Incredulity Hypothesis, which maintains that Milgram’s participants did not as a rule believe they were administering actual shocks. If the Incredulity Hypothesis were gener
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/87acceeb67624f58876110bf152ccd1a
Publikováno v:
Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 478-500 (2023)
In a series of studies in the U.S. (total N participants = 4,828) using both news articles (Studies 1-2) and constructed scenarios (Studies 3-4), we investigated how judgments of responsibility, blame, causal contribution, and punishment for alleged
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/37d5ffd3bdaa4666b2526019716f2bd9
Autor:
Mohammad Atari, Matthias R. Mehl, Jesse Graham, John M. Doris, Norbert Schwarz, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Ali Omrani, Brendan Kennedy, Elaine Gonzalez, Nikki Jafarzadeh, Alyzeh Hussain, Arineh Mirinjian, Annabelle Madden, Rhea Bhatia, Alexander Burch, Allison Harlan, David A. Sbarra, Charles L. Raison, Suzanne A. Moseley, Angelina J. Polsinelli, Morteza Dehghani
Publikováno v:
Scientific Reports, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2023)
Abstract Given its centrality in scholarly and popular discourse, morality should be expected to figure prominently in everyday talk. We test this expectation by examining the frequency of moral content in three contexts, using three methods: (a) Par
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1c58ec6ec45f4ce5920cf1141ed81485
Publikováno v:
Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
Messaging from U.S. authorities about COVID-19 has been widely divergent. This research aims to clarify popular perceptions of the COVID-19 threat and its effects on victims. In four studies with over 4,100 U.S. participants, we consistently found th
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e1592ef5f1d84c638debb4bc3d7df64e
In this chapter, we recount some of the most pressing objections to character scepticism, pointing out their limitations and, when appropriate, incorporating their suggestions. From here, we consider what empirically informed moral improvement might
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5beda66af6b482dce2d5ae17e3b5f839
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871712.013.32
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871712.013.32
Autor:
John M. Doris, Dominic Murphy
Publikováno v:
The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility ISBN: 0190679301
This chapter contends that the concept of evil is of limited explanatory utility for moral psychology. If evil is understood as very serious wrongdoing resulting from the exercise of morally responsible agency, instances of evil are probably vanishin
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d0aa2569eb102c5c89292312c1a45e1e
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679309.013.20
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679309.013.20
Autor:
John M. Doris
This chapter is a critical appraisal of the “character theory of excuses” in legal philosophy, which maintains that an excuse is available to a defendant when their action is not a manifestation of their character. The essay argues, using a strat
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9d3d7ef91f8c4b69d3e228a15b1f7e27
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0003
Autor:
John M. Doris
This chapter is one of the initial contributions to philosophy’s virtue ethics-situationism debate, referencing psychology’s person-situation debate to argue that traditional conceptions of character and virtue in philosophical moral psychology a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::24afff018fc7b2fa7b6332cdcb912384
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0001
Autor:
John M. Doris
This chapter derives from a book symposium on Doris’ (2002), Lack of Character, and responds to commentary by Annas, Arplay, and Solomon. The responses defend Doris’ situationist skepticism about character from a variety of objections. Among the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7bba7216df29ed13030b7bbe54ad100a
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0002
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0002
Autor:
John M. Doris
This chapter advances and refines the author’s character skepticism in light of the extensive commentary in philosophy, and significant developments in psychology, that have emerged since his original contributions to the debate (e.g., Doris, 1998,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::aa81a027b54aa522bbfce0f2a5b3ed8c
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0011
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719601.003.0011