Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 75
pro vyhledávání: '"John L. Heilbron"'
Autor:
Finn Aaserud, John L. Heilbron
Niels Bohr ranks with Einstein among the physicists of the 20th century. He rose to this status through his invention of the quantum theory of the atom and his leadership in its defense and development. He also ranks with Einstein in his humanism and
Autor:
John L. Heilbron
Just over four hundred years ago, in 1610, Galileo published the Siderius nuncius, or Starry Messenger, a'hurried little masterpiece'in John Heilbron's words. Presenting to the world his remarkable observations using the recently invented telescope -
Autor:
Jim Baggott, John L. Heilbron
In 1927, Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein began a debate about the interpretation and meaning of the new quantum theory. This would become one of the most famous debates in the history of science. At stake were an understanding of the purpose, and defe
Autor:
John L. Heilbron
How does the physics we know today - a highly professionalised enterprise, inextricably linked to government and industry - link back to its origins as a liberal art in Ancient Greece? What is the path that leads from the old philosophy of nature and
Publikováno v:
Benedict XIV and the Enlightenment: Art, Science, and Spirituality
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a6f3ea97490342fb56d0edf4c909b926
https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442624757-012
https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442624757-012
Autor:
John L. Heilbron
Publikováno v:
Niels Bohr, 1913-2013 ISBN: 9783319143156
Previously unavailable correspondence between Niels Bohr, his fiancee and his family, together with published yet unexploited Danish sources, now allows us to present a more detailed account than previously possible of the creation of the quantum ato
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::df2f3d981d7947257c2754d987e6ab81
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14316-3_4
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14316-3_4
Autor:
John L. Heilbron
Publikováno v:
The British Journal for the History of Science. 41:294-296