Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 13
pro vyhledávání: '"John D. Echeverria"'
Autor:
K. King Burnett, Roger Colinvaux, John D. Echeverria, Adam Looney, Nancy A. McLaughlin, Janet E. Milne, Ann Taylor Schwing
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The Supreme Court often says that a “per se” (or “categorical”) rule governs “physical taking” claims under the Taking Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These statements suggest the government must pay compensation w
Autor:
Sidney A. Shapiro, Robert R.M. Verchick, Karen C. Sokol, Maxine Burkett, Sarah Lamdan, Alice Kaswan, Evan Isaaceson, Christine A. Klein, Rebecca M. Bratspies, Katie Tracy, Joseph P. Tomain, Alyson C. Flournoy, Joel A. Mintz, Daniel A. Farber, Victor Byers Flatt, David Flores, John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The natural disasters of 2017-19 have exposed weaknesses in our preparation for disaster and climate change. What if we had paid attention — before disaster ensued — to how environmental protection and planning can prevent and minimize the harm t
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
Research Handbook on Climate Disaster Law ISBN: 9781786430038
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8c8da4aaabccb8e487c892393b410f92
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430038.00028
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430038.00028
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
Planning & Environmental Law. 60:3-12
The Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute (GELPI) at Georgetown University Law Center recently published a report entitled "The Track Record on Takings Legislation: Lessons from Democracy's Labora tories." The report examines in detail the
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
This paper presents case studies of the judicial electoral process and its implications for environmental legal protections in four states: Montana, North Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin. The paper builds on prior scholarship on judicial election
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
Planning & Environmental Law. 62:3-5
The Supreme Court’s resolution of Stop the Beach Renourishment has a frightening near-miss quality to it. Four justices led by Justice Scalia would have embraced, for the first time in the nation’s history, the petitioner’s radical judicial tak
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
Land Use Law & Zoning Digest. 52:3-11
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 98 S. Ct. 2646 (1978), 30 ZD 434, is justly celebrated. The case arose from New York City's efforts to preserve a famous historic landmark by blocking the constructi
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
This article argues that Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, the most widely discussed of the Supreme Court’s takings trilogy in the 2012-13 term, represents a major, unprincipled break from prior law and casts an unfortunate pall
Autor:
John D. Echeverria
Publikováno v:
Land Use Law & Zoning Digest. 54:19-21
Ten years ago, in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court announced a new “categorical” test for regulatory takings, a step that logically implied that there must also be a “noncategorical” takings test (based, most presume