Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 13
pro vyhledávání: '"John Bosland"'
Autor:
John Plante, Manuel Valdebran, Jessica Forcucci, John Bosland, Amira Elbendary, Richa Jaiswal, Dirk Elston
Publikováno v:
The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 45:323-325
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ed945694c9b78ac23044805e16c18e3b
https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000002398
https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000002398
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8c45095dc1b26f401da5c11e0e191e1a
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4405377
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4405377
Autor:
Jason John Bosland
Publikováno v:
Landmark Cases in Defamation Law
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7afb4ed679d8a946f3cfe54fa9f9b1fe
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916757.ch-004
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916757.ch-004
Autor:
Jason John Bosland
Publikováno v:
University of New South Wales Law Journal. 41
This article explores the powers available to courts in Victoria and New South Wales to restrain the media publication of ‘extraneous’ prejudicial material – that is, material that is derived from sources extraneous to court proceedings rather
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0af7cd5f9c7030b6c824bff6e7815e4e
https://doi.org/10.53637/wuma7908
https://doi.org/10.53637/wuma7908
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 74:234-260
Distinguishing “comment” from allegations of “fact” within the defamation defence of fair comment has long been notoriously difficult. While the defence has recently been replaced by a statutory “honest opinion” defence, the distinction r
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1ba72c80b6dc939091c1bfff96903aa6
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197315000343
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197315000343
Autor:
Jason John Bosland
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic) (‘OC Act’) was introduced in response to concerns that suppression orders were granted too frequently by the Victorian courts and that problems often existed in relation to the breadth, clarity and duration of such
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ea27e590f43e12adf73e89ef6c5dfcae
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982240
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982240
Autor:
Jason John Bosland, Vicki T. Huang
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
On March 1, 2010, Woman's Day magazine published a nude picture of a well known celebrity which was allegedly taken during an affair with an Australian football player. The day after publication, her publicist announced she would take legal action fo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a947fd261f9cf2a75cc499ad323c1046
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976139
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976139
Autor:
Jason John Bosland, Tanya Aplin
Strasbourg’s jurisprudence concerning when harm to reputation engages the Article 8 right to private life has been inconsistent and confusing. The Court has veered between accepting reputation as directly and automatically protected by Article 8 to
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::14ae90012720078f5a42e268add40b2c
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316402467.013
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316402467.013
Autor:
Jason John Bosland
Publikováno v:
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 31:89-110
This paper examines the ‘doctrine of reportage’—a particular application of the Reynolds qualified privilege defence to defamation recognized by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd. The doctrine of reportage provides protectio
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ed1b755c4c3723f9fa1839a3d0477fd3
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq035
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq035
Autor:
Jason John Bosland, Tanya Aplin
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Strasbourg’s jurisprudence concerning when harm to reputation engages the Article 8 right to private life has been inconsistent and confusing. The Court has veered between accepting reputation as directly and automatically protected by Article 8 to
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::69fa8982ab93431b3a429541ad67a151
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2674113
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2674113