Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 34
pro vyhledávání: '"John Bengson"'
Publikováno v:
British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 31:744-761
Publikováno v:
Mind.
This paper seeks to clarify one of the deepest questions about the source or ground of normativity, while also presenting an essence-based approach to answering it. We call it the ‘Arché Question.’ Though all metanormative theories must address
Publikováno v:
Journal of Moral Philosophy. 17:471-498
The Projectability Challenge states that a metaethical view must explain how ordinary agents can, on the basis of moral experience and reflection, accurately and justifiably apply moral concepts to novel situations. In this paper, we argue for two pr
This chapter tackles four questions about philosophical progress. The ‘existential question’ asks whether philosophy has made noetic progress—progress with respect to increasing theoretical understanding—in regard to its central questions. Th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::613c365de507373fffa7662731a10625
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0007
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0007
This brief Introduction identifies the main themes of the book. The first is the structure of philosophical inquiry, conceived as a species of theoretical inquiry. The second is what constitutes success or excellence at such inquiry, and thereby qual
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::04caaf467b6d5fadf27581ab968b8c40
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0001
This chapter opens with the provision of three data about method. These data concern features of actual philosophical practice, criteria for theory selection, and virtues of a sound method. The chapter then surveys four prominent philosophical method
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6718d2d92f9b178f8c0ea21ca6020730
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0005
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0005
This chapter introduces a novel method for philosophical theorizing that builds upon familiar elements of philosophical practice while combining, integrating, and clarifying them in new ways. This ‘Tri-Level Method’ calls on theorists to articula
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c62645f18b7aab3fd16f34a81c7e076c
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0006
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0006
This chapter proposes a two-stage model of theoretical inquiry—inquiry that, when successfully undertaken for its own sake, results in some epistemic or alethic achievement. At the first stage, inquirers use various procedures to collect data that
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2aaeb171f4a39c502052c81fdbd93132
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0002
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0002
This chapter defends the epistemic theory of data, according to which φ is a datum regarding domain D if, only if, and because φ is about D, does not belong to any well-formed theory of D, and inquirers are in a good epistemic position with r
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f08b064e2f02e287a9fe872c5b472e1e
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0004
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0004
This chapter discusses the nature of philosophical data, identifying their four basic features—data about data. Data are claims that are (i) inquiry-constraining, (ii) starting points for inquiry, (iii) collected via certain procedures, and (iv) ne
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::19321b3d28ce759ad0d5e654027a33c2
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862464.003.0003