Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 18
pro vyhledávání: '"Jeffrey A. Lefstin"'
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Less than a handful of casebooks are truly open source, in the sense of being fully modifiable. Patent Law: An Open-Source Casebook is the first patent law casebook that provides adopting professors, students, and others the ability to fully modify i
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ed2d7e01f0a5df67b988e5535b619e7f
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832016
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832016
Autor:
Peter S. Menell, Jeffrey A. Lefstin
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Notwithstanding the clarity of the U.S. Constitution’s grant of authority to Congress “[t]o promote the Progress of . . . useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to . . . Inventors the exclusive Right to their . . . Discoveries,” U.S. Const.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b0d3b38582951821885d16019c23d211
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795539
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795539
Autor:
Jeffrey A. Lefstin
Publikováno v:
Forgotten Intellectual Property Lore ISBN: 9781788978712
Neilson v. Harford has cast a long shadow over patent law. For American courts in the nineteenth century, the 1841 case from the Court of Exchequer was an authority whose “correctness has never been doubted and denied.” More recently, Neilson ser
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::eedc337dc8caf1cbe2eafe0e12f7eb03
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978712.00011
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978712.00011
Autor:
Peter S. Menell, Jeffrey A. Lefstin
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In Bilski v. Kappos (2010), this Court explained that its interpretation of 35 U.S.C. § 101 has been guided by over 150 years of historical practice. Yet two years later in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories (2012), the Court tri
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::60407fe29695322de9a9f7a4e1396c85
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477521
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477521
Autor:
Jeffrey A. Lefstin, Peter S. Menell
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Seven years ago, the Supreme Court triggered a drastic and far-reaching experiment in patent eligibility standards. During the preceding decades, district courts invalidated a small handful of patents per year on eligibility grounds. Since the Court
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::41b5f9b57391228d7e0f684692348cad
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3399499
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3399499
Autor:
Peter S. Menell, Jeffrey A. Lefstin
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. (2012), the Supreme Court triggered the most radical redefinition of patent-eligible subject matter in U.S. history by engrafting onto § 101 an inventive application requirement for pat
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5308294960f1730eb920b4f64fa94975
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2767904
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2767904
Autor:
Jeffrey A. Lefstin, Peter S. Menell
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Over the past five years, the U.S. Supreme Court has reinvigorated patentable subject-matter limitations, issuing four significant decisions after nearly three dormant decades. These decisions reflect justifiable concerns about the patenting of abstr
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::272b4e6b85514f68d3d960b2b9b36e78
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2652452
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2652452
Autor:
Jeffrey A. Lefstin, Peter S. Menell
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
As reflected in the Federal Circuit’s fractured opinion in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp., there is no greater confusion in contemporary patent law than that surrounding the scope of patent eligibility limitations. This Supreme Court amicus brief in that
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b2c9e3a8312b4eaeeef06e745221d4b0
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402776
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402776
Autor:
Jeffrey A. Lefstin
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The Supreme Court’s recent cases on patent-eligible subject matter have struggled to draw the line between unpatentable fundamental principles, such as laws of nature and abstract ideas, and patentable inventions. In Mayo v. Prometheus, the Court s
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9754b72bc38c71979f82fa2770a45cd9
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398696
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398696