Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 40
pro vyhledávání: '"Jean H. M. Wagemans"'
Publikováno v:
Languages, Vol 7, Iss 1, p 59 (2022)
Reported speech, or relata refero, although not always part of the argumentation tout court, can be an important element of argumentative discourse. It might, for instance, provide information on the position of another party in the discussion or fun
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/58cdb2ae170240eeb53550a5239d8706
Autor:
Kees van Berkel, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Topoi, 42(2). Springer Netherlands
This paper examines the conceptual and terminological overlap between theories and models of practical deliberation developed within the fields of Practical Reasoning (PR) and Practical Argumentation (PA). It carefully delineates the volitional, epis
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e054121e748b24e456dc4be2b0b2a9e4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09901-w
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09901-w
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 10(2), 171-201. John Benjamins Publishing Company
The central metaphor in cognitive science is the computer metaphor of the brain. In previous work, we reconstructed the metaphor in a novel way, guided by the assumption that it functions as an explanatory hypothesis. We developed an argumentative pa
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::74ff07208689f329c9fcfdd84e22fd66
https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/c02a14cd-d9d0-427d-b036-85b6e8479d5e
https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/c02a14cd-d9d0-427d-b036-85b6e8479d5e
Autor:
Eugen Octav Popa, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141. Elsevier
Journal of Pragmatics 186 (2021)
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141. Elsevier
Journal of Pragmatics 186 (2021)
We develop a method for analyzing argumentative discussions centered around the notion of ‘stock issues’, i.e., the field-dependent standard issues addressed by the participants in such discussions. The method yields an overview of the structure
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c3c7c9fa42d796d952c63607ae7d501a
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.021
Publikováno v:
Argumentation
Argumentation, 35(1), 101-139. Springer Netherlands
Argumentation, 35(1), 101-139. Springer Netherlands
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of arg
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::01aaca26b3fe2889a5a7af056b0e4c60
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x
Autor:
Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Research in Language, 17(1), 57-69. De Gruyter
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the basis of a survey of classical and contemporary definitions of argument, a set of assumptions is formulated regarding the linguistic and pragmatic aspect
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::620ef111ae3f6449bfd2a93c5104e4d6
https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/6ae6b608-165c-4afa-a835-80f4e92f7200
https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/6ae6b608-165c-4afa-a835-80f4e92f7200
Autor:
Martin Hinton, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Argumentation, 36(1). Springer Netherlands
In this paper, we formulate a procedure for assessing reasoning as it is expressed in natural arguments. The procedure is a specification of one of the three aspects of argumentation assessment distinguished in the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a4a08ba5fa61ae9ff45637de6ac49c01
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/evaluating-reasoning-in-natural-arguments-a-procedural-approach(042720cc-79f3-43c8-9816-6bb5ef7662e0).html
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/evaluating-reasoning-in-natural-arguments-a-procedural-approach(042720cc-79f3-43c8-9816-6bb5ef7662e0).html
Autor:
Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp 63-75 (2018)
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. University of Bialystok
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. University of Bialystok
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analogy within the theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments, a new method for describing and classifying arguments that integrates traditio
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::269892f03912a9c4012217c8e8257ae9
https://doaj.org/article/aad1a93bc7c44cf0997b7f30778791e3
https://doaj.org/article/aad1a93bc7c44cf0997b7f30778791e3
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(3), 317-335. John Benjamins Publishing Company
The computer metaphor of the brain is frequently criticized by scientists and philosophers outside the computational paradigm. Proponents of the metaphor may then seek to defend its explanatory merits, in which case the metaphor functions as a standp
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::008bf4a525178bf499521a9ce77d35bd
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/an-argumentative-reconstruction-of-the-computer-metaphor-of-the-brain(53297992-9fd8-4802-aa3b-80c8b468acb8).html
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/an-argumentative-reconstruction-of-the-computer-metaphor-of-the-brain(53297992-9fd8-4802-aa3b-80c8b468acb8).html
Autor:
Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 7(2), 138-140. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::01687154d85ebcf950234cb36e3bc613
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18033.wag
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18033.wag