Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 111
pro vyhledávání: '"Jean H. M. Wagemans"'
Autor:
Alban Bouvier
Publikováno v:
L'Année sociologique. 68:e7
Autor:
Gordon, Thomas F.
Publikováno v:
OSSA Conference Archive
N/A
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______2870::6c3dabda9a4a52d5b2493701dc21bd44
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/168
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/168
Publikováno v:
Languages, Vol 7, Iss 1, p 59 (2022)
Reported speech, or relata refero, although not always part of the argumentation tout court, can be an important element of argumentative discourse. It might, for instance, provide information on the position of another party in the discussion or fun
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/58cdb2ae170240eeb53550a5239d8706
Autor:
Kees van Berkel, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Topoi, 42(2). Springer Netherlands
This paper examines the conceptual and terminological overlap between theories and models of practical deliberation developed within the fields of Practical Reasoning (PR) and Practical Argumentation (PA). It carefully delineates the volitional, epis
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 10(2), 171-201. John Benjamins Publishing Company
The central metaphor in cognitive science is the computer metaphor of the brain. In previous work, we reconstructed the metaphor in a novel way, guided by the assumption that it functions as an explanatory hypothesis. We developed an argumentative pa
Autor:
Eugen Octav Popa, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141. Elsevier
Journal of Pragmatics 186 (2021)
Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141. Elsevier
Journal of Pragmatics 186 (2021)
We develop a method for analyzing argumentative discussions centered around the notion of ‘stock issues’, i.e., the field-dependent standard issues addressed by the participants in such discussions. The method yields an overview of the structure
Publikováno v:
Argumentation
Argumentation, 35(1), 101-139. Springer Netherlands
Argumentation, 35(1), 101-139. Springer Netherlands
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of arg
Autor:
Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Research in Language, 17(1), 57-69. De Gruyter
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the basis of a survey of classical and contemporary definitions of argument, a set of assumptions is formulated regarding the linguistic and pragmatic aspect
Autor:
Martin Hinton, Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Argumentation, 36(1). Springer Netherlands
In this paper, we formulate a procedure for assessing reasoning as it is expressed in natural arguments. The procedure is a specification of one of the three aspects of argumentation assessment distinguished in the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure
Autor:
Jean H. M. Wagemans
Publikováno v:
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp 63-75 (2018)
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. University of Bialystok
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. University of Bialystok
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analogy within the theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments, a new method for describing and classifying arguments that integrates traditio