Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 28
pro vyhledávání: '"J. Gregory Olley"'
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley, Ann W. Cox
Publikováno v:
APA handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities: Clinical and educational implications: Prevention, intervention, and treatment (Vol. 2).
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::18f9bcafe2f57531bc149001238bad50
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000195-012
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000195-012
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley
Publikováno v:
Applied Neuropsychology. 16:135-140
The United States Supreme Court's Atkins v. Virginia (2002) decision has created a need for experts who are knowledgeable and experienced in both mental retardation and forensic psychology. This article summarizes the issues that are critical to the
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley, Caroline Everington
Publikováno v:
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 8:1-23
The 2002 Supreme Court decision in Atkins v. Virginia prohibited the execution of defendants with mental retardation and required that professional standards be applied in the diagnosis of mental retardation in capital cases. Mental retardation diagn
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley
Publikováno v:
Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley
Publikováno v:
School Psychology Review. 28:595-607
For many years research on the nature of autism and teaching methods has overshadowed the development of effective curriculum. Nevertheless, a valuable body of knowledge is available that offers pr...
Autor:
J. Gregory Olley
Publikováno v:
Intellectual and developmental disabilities. 51(2)
Definitions and associated descriptions of the condition now commonly known as intellectual disability serve many functions. The Atkins v. Virginia U.S. Supreme Court decision (2002) has called attention to the importance of clear, objective, and mea
Publikováno v:
Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science
In 2002, the US Supreme Court held in Atkins v. Virginia that the execution of individuals with mental retardation (also referred to as intellectual disability) is unconstitutional. Following the Atkins holding, courts in death penalty jurisdictions
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::42400284348266e4fef49f54613ac63f
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa253
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa253