A tool for merging extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks

Autor: Jérôme Delobelle, Jean-Guy Mailly

Publikováno v: Argument & Computation, Vol 13, Iss 3, Pp 361-368 (2022)

We describe a tool that allows the merging of extensions of argumentation frameworks, following the approach defined by (In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’16) (2016)

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/52a949a1c9ec4a67b8729146ba0f721d

A Principle-based Account of Self-attacking Arguments in Gradual Semantics

Autor: Vivien Beuselinck, Jérôme Delobelle, Srdjan Vesic

Publikováno v: Journal of Logic and Computation. 33:230-256

The issue of how a semantics should deal with self-attacking arguments was always a subject of debate among argumentation scholars. A consensus exists for extension-based semantics because those arguments are always rejected (as soon as the semantics

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bb48328748d95da5ff9d5374c7ffc6ba
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exac093

Interpretability of Gradual Semantics in Abstract Argumentation

Autor: Jérôme Delobelle, Serena Villata

Publikováno v: ECSQARU 2019-15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
ECSQARU 2019-15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Sep 2019, Belgrade, Serbia
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783030297640
ECSQARU

International audience; rgumentation, in the field of Artificial Intelligence, is a for-malism allowing to reason with contradictory information as well as tomodel an exchange of arguments between one or several agents. For thispurpose, many semantic

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a6ef2b9519c3acf2c3f7fdfae288f2e4
https://hal.science/hal-02277678

A Parametrized Ranking-based Semantics for Persuasion

Autor: Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Elise Bonzon, Nicolas Maudet

Publikováno v: Scalable Uncertainty Management
11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2017)
11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2017), Oct 2017, Grenade, Spain. Springer, Scalable Uncertainty Management, 10564, pp.237-251, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 〈10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_17〉
11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2017), Oct 2017, Grenade, Spain. pp.237-251, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_17⟩
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783319675817
SUM

International audience; In this paper we question the ability of the existant ranking semantics for argumentation to capture persuasion settings, emphasizing in particular the phenomena of protocatalepsis (the fact that it is often efficient to antic

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c4c3520353edb5734f2002bd08ef02c2
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01650122

A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

Autor: Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Nicolas Maudet

Publikováno v: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016)
30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016)
30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016), Feb 2016, Phoenix, United States. Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016)
30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016), Feb 2016, Phoenix, United States
Scopus-Elsevier
HAL

Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics h

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fb7d7b771790e5e262d8936cd393a797
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01263996/file/BDKMAAAI16.pdf