Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 14
pro vyhledávání: '"Ivan Ivashchenko"'
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko, Vitali Terletsky
Publikováno v:
Філософія освіти, Vol 26, Iss 1, Pp 211-229 (2020)
The paper deals with the Ukrainian translation of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781/87). We tried to answer the question of whether the Ukrainian reader who is willing to understand Kant's argument but does not understand the German origi
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/76a9b33ef25345e3999d7257116712cf
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 38:124-150
In this conversation, American philosopher Robert Brandom talks about the historical background of his inferentialism, reconstructing the influence of his teachers Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Rorty.
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 38:137-152
Conversation about expected translation into Ukrainian of Gumbrecht's book Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey (Stanford UP: Stanford, 2004).
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 36:152-165
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 34:6-24
The epistemic status of our access to the world has always given rise to vivacious debates in Western philosophy. The crucial point of these discussions was the connection between conceptual and non-conceptual elements of our relation to the world. T
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 31:108-112
In the article are commented the main concepts used by Fichte in his “An Attempt at a New Presentation of the Wissenschaftlehre” (1797). Autor point out also the reasons for choosing Ukrainian analogs for this terminology. In particular, makes th
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 30:80-93
This article deals with the structure of argument in the General Theory of Mind as a Pure Act by Italian Idealist philosopher Giovanni Gentile. Special attention was paid to the philosophic context of his theory. The author claims that Gentile’s th
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 29:163-168
The commentary casts light on the specific of Gentile’s terminology used in his theory. In particular, is considered the difference between his usage of “lo spirito” (spirit) and “la mente” (mind).
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 28:7-29
The object of the paper is to consider the potential of Kant’s transcendental argument in re-lation to Ernst Tugendhat’s “symmetry argument”. The point of Tugendhat’s argument is the hypothesis that the relevant epistemic use of the first p
Autor:
Ivan Ivashchenko
Publikováno v:
Sententiae. 26:28-68
The paper deals with Fichte’s attempt to develop the non-reflexive theory of selfconsciousness and with an influence of this theory on the transcendental philosophical discussion within the bounds of Heidelberg School (D. Henrich, U. Pothast, M. Fr