Zobrazeno 1 - 6
of 6
pro vyhledávání: '"Hubertus A.A.M. van Vliet"'
Publikováno v:
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e76b2ed3b8f1624ef584e8226f47baea
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.006
Autor:
Tjalina Hamerlynck, Steffi van Wessel, Hubertus A.A.M. van Vliet, Steven Weyers, Benedictus C. Schoot
Publikováno v:
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 259
Objectives To compare hysteroscopic morcellation with bipolar resection for the removal of submucous type 0 and 1 myomas, in terms of procedure time (primary outcome), adverse events, tissue availability, short term effectiveness and postoperative ad
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9efa108bd6da269efa26a8c306c70833
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33571839
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33571839
Autor:
Nele Coryn, Hubertus A.A.M. van Vliet, Steffi van Wessel, Benedictus C. Schoot, Steven Weyers, Tjalina Hamerlynck
Publikováno v:
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 27(4)
Study Objective To evaluate the reproductive outcomes in women treated for retained products of conception (RPOC) by hysteroscopy (morcellation vs loop resection). Design Cohort study. Setting A teaching and university hospital. Patients Patients inc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::28e828d14f2430541e029c3f14ecf5ca
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31352066
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31352066
Publikováno v:
Contraception. 65(5)
Side effects caused by oral contraceptives discourage compliance with and continuation of oral contraceptives. A suggested disadvantage of biphasic oral contraceptive pills compared to triphasic oral contraceptive pills is an increase in breakthrough
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fc83f62b865d2bbe7f5953259dfba927
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12057781
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12057781
Publikováno v:
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 108(6)
Genetic counselling traditionally expresses risk in proportions (e.g. 1 in 112) rather than as rates (e.g., 8.9 per 1000). The justification for this practice is unclear. To assess the understanding of lay persons of the risk of Down's Syndrome, whet
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::63ca15da932ddf156dc272c8f422cadc
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11426902
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11426902
Publikováno v:
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 108:649-650
Genetic counselling traditionally expresses risk in proportions (e.g. 1 in 112) rather than as rates (e.g., 8.9 per 1000). The justification for this practice is unclear. To assess the understanding of lay persons of the risk of Down's Syndrome, whet
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::61d91b6ad6e1a8b1e7136ecb10c8b889
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00151-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00151-0