Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 97
pro vyhledávání: '"Harold J. Spaeth"'
The Supreme Court Compendium provides historical and statistical information on the Supreme Court: its institutional development; caseload; decision trends; the background, nomination, and voting behavior of its justices; its relationship with publ
Autor:
Harold J. Spaeth, Sara C. Benesh
Publikováno v:
American Politics Research. 35:755-768
To study the behavior of judges, one must first consider whether judges are just like any other political actor (e.g., legislators) or whether, because of their affiliation with the judiciary, law constrains their behavior to some extent. Research ai
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::931f49dffe38db4c12563a8c825f53c7
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x06296991
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x06296991
Publikováno v:
Public Choice. 130:225-237
We investigate whether the substantial use of the outcome-prediction strategy by Supreme Court justices occurs in the petitions denied certiorari by the Court. We show with a computer simulation that [Caldeira, G.A., Wright, J.R., & Zorn, C.J.W. (199
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::92e5480f2ad9b788cb75f602c562a021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9082-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9082-4
Autor:
Harold J. Spaeth
Publikováno v:
Justice System Journal. 25:143-158
Relisting began early in the Burger Court presumably because of the Supreme Court's steadily increasing docket. Any justice for any reason at any stage could have a case held over until the Court's next conference. More than two-thirds of the reliste
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9845869a4557e0ada9daa3db2604d2dd
https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2004.10767715
https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2004.10767715
Publikováno v:
The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments, 5th Ed.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::131a1693e714c8271c0d4c189fbf076c
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376592.n8
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376592.n8
Publikováno v:
American Politics Research. 30:219-234
Given that the Supreme Court usually reverses the decision of the court below, why would justices who agree with that decision vote to hear the case? In other words, why would affirmminded justices vote to grant cert? Scholars refer to such behavior
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8ed8b9b32e3dc351b211ed8cbd5bb0b8
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x02030003001
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x02030003001
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Politics. 60:801-818
Do the political preferences of U.S. Supreme Court justices change over time? Judicial specialists are virtually unanimous in their response: The occasional anomaly notwithstanding, most jurists evince consistent voting behavior over the course of th
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0f437067f0a7d1cae300c1c591e6f927
https://doi.org/10.2307/2647649
https://doi.org/10.2307/2647649
Autor:
Harold J. Spaeth, Saul Brenner
Publikováno v:
Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9fa5bee635d9ccbd2d9a6c3b50ecf4f5
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511759215.012
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511759215.012
Autor:
Harold J. Spaeth, Saul Brenner
Publikováno v:
Stare Indecisis. :112-121
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5852bdb710088e0cf7070f5503434ac2
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511759215.011
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511759215.011