Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"Guibor Camargo"'
Autor:
Guibor Camargo, Andrés Miguel Sampayo, Andrés Peña Galindo, Francisco J Escobedo, Fernando Carriazo, Alejandro Feged-Rivadeneira
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0242266 (2020)
Anthropogenic change has been associated with population growth, land use change, and changing economies. However, internal migration patterns and armed conflicts are also key drivers of anthropogenic and demographic processes. To better understand t
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/fed2041037d745b0a494259d0ec3ba0c
Autor:
Francisco J. Escobedo, Marius Bottin, Nicola Clerici, Salamanca Guibor Camargo, Alejandro Feged-Rivadeneira
Publikováno v:
Aggrey JJ, Ros-Tonen MA, Asubonteng KO (2021) Using participatory spatial tools to unravel community perceptions of land-use dynamics in a mine-expanding landscape in Ghana. Environ Manage 68:1–18.
Agresti A (2013) Categorical data analysis, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, United States
Bagstad KJ, Reed JM, Semmens DJ, Sherrouse BC, Troy A (2016) Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem
service assessments: A case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2005–2018
Brown, G (2012) An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl Geogr 34:289–294
Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2012) Public Participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 25:633–651
Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475
Brown G, Kyttä M (2018) Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Appl Geogr 95:1–8
Brown G, Weber D, De Bie K (2014) Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Appl Geogr 53:77–89
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29
CAR (2017) Evaluación Regional del Agua Cuenca Alta río Bogotá. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. https://www.car.gov.co/uploads/files/5ae21dac0e581.pdf (Accessed: June 2020)
Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo F, Rubiano K, Villegas JC (2019) Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Sci Total Environ 685:1181–1192
Cortés-S SP, Van der Hammen T, Rangel-Ch JO (1999) Comunidades vegetales y patrones de degradación y sucesión en la vegetación de los Cerros Occidentales de Chía-Cundinamarca-Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc 23:529–554
Damastuti E, de Groot R (2019) Participatory ecosystem service mapping to enhance community-based mangrove rehabilitation and management in Demak, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 19:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1378-7
DANE Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística de Colombia (2018). Censo Nacional 2018. https://sitios.dane.gov. co/cnpv/app/views/informacion/perfiles/11_infografia.pdf (Accessed: May 2020)
Darvill R, Lindo Z (2015) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosyst Serv 13:153–161
Do TH, Vu TP, Catacutan D, Nguyen VT (2020). Governing Landscapes for Ecosystem Services: A Participatory Land-Use Scenario Development in the Northwest Montane Region of Vietnam. Environ Manage 68(5):1–18
Ernst A (2019) How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis. J Environ Manag 238:368–381
Escobedo FJ, Bottin M, Cala D, Montoya DLS (2020) Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23:1039–1049
Ernstson H (2013) The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 109 (1):7–17
Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N (2009) Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in coastal Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187:43–60
Fagerholm N, Eilola S, Kisanga D, Arki V, Käyhkö N (2019a) Placebased landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landsc Ecol 34(7):1769–1787
Fagerholm N, Torralba M, Moreno G, Girardello M, Herzog F, Aviron S, Burgess P, Crous-Duran J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Graves A, Hartel T (2019b) Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes. Glob Environ Chan 56:134–147
Gaillard JC, Monteil C, Perrillat-Collomb A, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary M, Chaudhary O et al. (2013) Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Appl Geogr 45:158–166
García-Díez V, García-Llorente M, González JA (2020) Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Madrid: Insights for landscape planning. Land 9:244
Graham M (2014) Inequitable distributions in internet geographies: The global south is gaining access but lags in local content. Innovations 9(3–4):17–34
Golledge RG (1993): Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In: Gärling T, Golledge RG (eds) Behaviour and environment: psychological and geographical approaches, Elsevier Press, North Holland, 16–46
Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. Pearson Education International, Upper saddle River, New Jersey
Heikinheimo V, Tenkanen H, Bergroth C, Järv O, Hiippala T, Toivonen T (2020) Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc Urban Plan 201:103845
Hui R, Wescoat Jr JL (2019) Visualizing peri-urban and rurban water conditions in Pune district, Maharashtra, India. Geoforum 102:255–266
Hunt LM (2015) Monitoring changes in forest resource advisory groups’ composition and evaluations of perceptions of public participation effectiveness: A case of Ontario’s Local Citizens Committees. Can J For Res 45(12):1866–1872
Kahriman-Ozturk D, Olgan R, Tuncer G (2012) A qualitative study on Turkish preschool children’s environmental attitudes through ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. Int J Sci Educ 34(4):629–650
Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc Ecol 29(8):1347–1360
Mendoza JE, Etter A (2002) Multitemporal analysis (1940–1996) of land cover changes in the southwestern Bogotá High-plain. Landsc Urban Plan 59:147–158
McCall MK, Dunn CE (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum 43(1):81–94
Mosso CE, Hostetler M, Ecobedo FJ (2020). Urban expansion into native forests in Patagonia, Argentina: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions regarding spatial planning. J Environ Plann Man 64:1–22
Ooms K, De Maeyer P, Dupont L, Van der Veken N, Van de Weghe N, Verplaetse S (2016) Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 43(2):134–153
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Del Amo DG, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):237–251
Perez A (2019). Landscape Literacy: Teaching to Read the World through a Curricular-Spatial Analysis. Int. J. Crit. Pedagogy, 10(1):141–158
Priego C, Breuste JH, Rojas J (2008) Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: A comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile, and Spain. Landsc Online 7(1):22
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Ramadier T, Bronner AC (2006) Knowledge of the environment and spatial cognition: JRS as a technique for improving comparisons between social groups. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33(2):285–299
Rambaldi G, Kyem PAK, McCall M, Weiner D (2006) Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electron J Inf Syst Developing Ctries 25(1):1–9
Reilly K, Adamowski J, John K (2018) Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosyst Serv 30:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002
Rubiano K, Clerici N, Norden N, Etter A (2017) Secondary forest and shrubland dynamics in a highly transformed landscape in the Northern Andes of Colombia (1985–2015). Forests 8:216
Sironen S, Leskinen P, Kangas A, Hujala T (2014) Variation of preference inconsistency when applying ratio and interval scale pairwise comparisons. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 21:183–195
Shim D (2014) Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum 51:152–160
Trimble M, Lázaro M (2014) Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from coastal Uruguay. Environ Manag 54 (1):122–137
Tu Huynh N, Doherty ST (2007) Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. Cartographica: Int J Geographic Inf Geovisualization 42(4):285–296
Vlami V, Zogaris S, Djuma H, Kokkoris IP, Kehayias G, Dimopoulos PA (2019) Field method for landscape conservation surveying: The landscape assessment protocol (LAP). Sustainability 11(7)
Whiston Spirn A (2005) Restoring mill creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice, and city planning and design. Land Res 30(3):395–413
Willock J, Deary IJ, Edwards-Jones G, Gibson GJ, McGregor MJ, Sutherland A et al. (1999) The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland. J Agr Econ 50(2):286–303
Xie M, Vacher HL, Reader S, Walton E (2018) Quantitative map literacy: A cross between map literacy and quantitative literacy. Numeracy 11(1):4
Yu-Jen H (2010) Understanding anthropocentric/biocentric orientations toward natural parks. A survey of student at Oklahoma State University (Master dissertation), Oklahoma State University, USA
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Agresti A (2013) Categorical data analysis, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, United States
Bagstad KJ, Reed JM, Semmens DJ, Sherrouse BC, Troy A (2016) Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem
service assessments: A case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2005–2018
Brown, G (2012) An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl Geogr 34:289–294
Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2012) Public Participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 25:633–651
Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475
Brown G, Kyttä M (2018) Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Appl Geogr 95:1–8
Brown G, Weber D, De Bie K (2014) Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Appl Geogr 53:77–89
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29
CAR (2017) Evaluación Regional del Agua Cuenca Alta río Bogotá. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. https://www.car.gov.co/uploads/files/5ae21dac0e581.pdf (Accessed: June 2020)
Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo F, Rubiano K, Villegas JC (2019) Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Sci Total Environ 685:1181–1192
Cortés-S SP, Van der Hammen T, Rangel-Ch JO (1999) Comunidades vegetales y patrones de degradación y sucesión en la vegetación de los Cerros Occidentales de Chía-Cundinamarca-Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc 23:529–554
Damastuti E, de Groot R (2019) Participatory ecosystem service mapping to enhance community-based mangrove rehabilitation and management in Demak, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 19:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1378-7
DANE Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística de Colombia (2018). Censo Nacional 2018. https://sitios.dane.gov. co/cnpv/app/views/informacion/perfiles/11_infografia.pdf (Accessed: May 2020)
Darvill R, Lindo Z (2015) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosyst Serv 13:153–161
Do TH, Vu TP, Catacutan D, Nguyen VT (2020). Governing Landscapes for Ecosystem Services: A Participatory Land-Use Scenario Development in the Northwest Montane Region of Vietnam. Environ Manage 68(5):1–18
Ernst A (2019) How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis. J Environ Manag 238:368–381
Escobedo FJ, Bottin M, Cala D, Montoya DLS (2020) Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23:1039–1049
Ernstson H (2013) The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 109 (1):7–17
Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N (2009) Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in coastal Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187:43–60
Fagerholm N, Eilola S, Kisanga D, Arki V, Käyhkö N (2019a) Placebased landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landsc Ecol 34(7):1769–1787
Fagerholm N, Torralba M, Moreno G, Girardello M, Herzog F, Aviron S, Burgess P, Crous-Duran J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Graves A, Hartel T (2019b) Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes. Glob Environ Chan 56:134–147
Gaillard JC, Monteil C, Perrillat-Collomb A, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary M, Chaudhary O et al. (2013) Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Appl Geogr 45:158–166
García-Díez V, García-Llorente M, González JA (2020) Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Madrid: Insights for landscape planning. Land 9:244
Graham M (2014) Inequitable distributions in internet geographies: The global south is gaining access but lags in local content. Innovations 9(3–4):17–34
Golledge RG (1993): Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In: Gärling T, Golledge RG (eds) Behaviour and environment: psychological and geographical approaches, Elsevier Press, North Holland, 16–46
Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. Pearson Education International, Upper saddle River, New Jersey
Heikinheimo V, Tenkanen H, Bergroth C, Järv O, Hiippala T, Toivonen T (2020) Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc Urban Plan 201:103845
Hui R, Wescoat Jr JL (2019) Visualizing peri-urban and rurban water conditions in Pune district, Maharashtra, India. Geoforum 102:255–266
Hunt LM (2015) Monitoring changes in forest resource advisory groups’ composition and evaluations of perceptions of public participation effectiveness: A case of Ontario’s Local Citizens Committees. Can J For Res 45(12):1866–1872
Kahriman-Ozturk D, Olgan R, Tuncer G (2012) A qualitative study on Turkish preschool children’s environmental attitudes through ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. Int J Sci Educ 34(4):629–650
Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc Ecol 29(8):1347–1360
Mendoza JE, Etter A (2002) Multitemporal analysis (1940–1996) of land cover changes in the southwestern Bogotá High-plain. Landsc Urban Plan 59:147–158
McCall MK, Dunn CE (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum 43(1):81–94
Mosso CE, Hostetler M, Ecobedo FJ (2020). Urban expansion into native forests in Patagonia, Argentina: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions regarding spatial planning. J Environ Plann Man 64:1–22
Ooms K, De Maeyer P, Dupont L, Van der Veken N, Van de Weghe N, Verplaetse S (2016) Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 43(2):134–153
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Del Amo DG, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):237–251
Perez A (2019). Landscape Literacy: Teaching to Read the World through a Curricular-Spatial Analysis. Int. J. Crit. Pedagogy, 10(1):141–158
Priego C, Breuste JH, Rojas J (2008) Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: A comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile, and Spain. Landsc Online 7(1):22
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Ramadier T, Bronner AC (2006) Knowledge of the environment and spatial cognition: JRS as a technique for improving comparisons between social groups. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33(2):285–299
Rambaldi G, Kyem PAK, McCall M, Weiner D (2006) Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electron J Inf Syst Developing Ctries 25(1):1–9
Reilly K, Adamowski J, John K (2018) Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosyst Serv 30:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002
Rubiano K, Clerici N, Norden N, Etter A (2017) Secondary forest and shrubland dynamics in a highly transformed landscape in the Northern Andes of Colombia (1985–2015). Forests 8:216
Sironen S, Leskinen P, Kangas A, Hujala T (2014) Variation of preference inconsistency when applying ratio and interval scale pairwise comparisons. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 21:183–195
Shim D (2014) Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum 51:152–160
Trimble M, Lázaro M (2014) Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from coastal Uruguay. Environ Manag 54 (1):122–137
Tu Huynh N, Doherty ST (2007) Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. Cartographica: Int J Geographic Inf Geovisualization 42(4):285–296
Vlami V, Zogaris S, Djuma H, Kokkoris IP, Kehayias G, Dimopoulos PA (2019) Field method for landscape conservation surveying: The landscape assessment protocol (LAP). Sustainability 11(7)
Whiston Spirn A (2005) Restoring mill creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice, and city planning and design. Land Res 30(3):395–413
Willock J, Deary IJ, Edwards-Jones G, Gibson GJ, McGregor MJ, Sutherland A et al. (1999) The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland. J Agr Econ 50(2):286–303
Xie M, Vacher HL, Reader S, Walton E (2018) Quantitative map literacy: A cross between map literacy and quantitative literacy. Numeracy 11(1):4
Yu-Jen H (2010) Understanding anthropocentric/biocentric orientations toward natural parks. A survey of student at Oklahoma State University (Master dissertation), Oklahoma State University, USA
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Se sabe poco sobre cómo influye la alfabetización espacial en la elaboración de mapas y la toma de decisiones relacionadas con la gestión medioambiental y los servicios ecosistémicos. Evaluamos el papel de la alfabetización espacial del paisaje
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d06f6e29b23ead36fc0b83b0964278c9
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37692
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37692
Autor:
Andrés Miguel Sampayo, Fernando Carriazo, Guibor Camargo, Andrés Peña Galindo, Alejandro Feged-Rivadeneira, Francisco J. Escobedo
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0242266 (2020)
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0242266 (2020)
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
El cambio antropogénico se ha asociado con el crecimiento de la población, el cambio del uso de la tierra y las economías cambiantes. Sin embargo, los patrones de migración interna y los conflictos armados también son impulsores clave de los pro
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::1b30b253dc28d44a82cd1ae7e7981969
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7685458
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7685458
Autor:
Alejandro Feged Rivadeneira, Andrés Peña Galindo, Francisco J. Escobedo, Andrés Miguel Sampayo, Guibor Camargo, Fernando Carriazo Osorio
Anthropogenic change is generally associated with population growth, land use change, and changing economies. However, internal migration patterns and armed conflicts can also be key drivers behind these anthropogenic change and demographic change pr
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::039f0df9c19ab4b09ac3dfc4d78b936c