French et al. v. Stange Mining Co. et al. Sept. 21 1922. [114 S. E. 121.]

Publikováno v: The Virginia Law Register, 1923 Feb 01. 8(10), 759-763.

Externí odkaz: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1108902

Does prosody improve the acceptability and comprehension of polyfunctional discourse markers? Studies on French et and alors

Autor: Didirkova, Ivana, Crible, Ludivine, Simon, Anne-Catherine

Publikováno v: Discourse in corpus and experimental data: Bridging the methodological gap
Discourse in corpus and experimental data: Bridging the methodological gap, Mar 2021, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

International audience

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::bf51aa1638af33d325d95a661bea6fba
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03175104

French et al. v. Chapin-Sacks Mfg. Co., Inc. Nov. 11, 1915. [86 S. E. 842.]

Publikováno v: The Virginia Law Register, 1916 Feb 01. 1(10), 773-774.

Externí odkaz: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1104249

Vyjádření cizího mínění ve francouzštině a češtině

Autor: Jupová, Andrea

The aim of this master's thesis is to describe certain aspects of the matter of la non-prise en charge (in English, the addressor's non-commitment to the truth of the proposition). The theoretical part defines someone else's opinion. At the same time

Externí odkaz: http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-369943

Attorney and Client. Negligence of Attorney. Actions. Pleading. French et al. v. Armstrong, 76 Atl. Rep., 336 (N. J.)

Publikováno v: The Yale Law Journal, 1911 Feb 01. 20(4), 324-324.

Externí odkaz: https://www.jstor.org/stable/784175