Zobrazeno 1 - 7
of 7
pro vyhledávání: '"Florent Moncomble"'
Autor:
Florent Moncomble
Publikováno v:
Corela, Vol 40 (2023)
Even though Gustave Guillaume never delved into an actual exploration of the proper noun (whose scope he did not strictly delineate either), one can distinguish two stages in its theory in psychomechanics. Early on, the proper noun is defined as a wo
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/64563fa7f0014019bae0e8ef358cd145
Autor:
Florent Moncomble
Publikováno v:
Corela, Vol 37 (2023)
Linguistic theories in general, and psychomechanics in particular, with its essentially binary model, struggle to account for bare nouns within the larger system of the articles. Though the term ‘zero article’ is commonly found in the literature,
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/68dcf309730a40849c82ab2ad9fad629
Autor:
Florent MONCOMBLE
Publikováno v:
E-REA, Vol 15 (2018)
The syntax of newspaper headlines in English displays features which, on a superficial level, set it apart from the norm of Standard English. This, however, is not to say that headlinese stands outside the notion of a linguistic norm: drawing from a
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c655fb9a0ba84957a75e6b42e2a2a262
Autor:
Florent MONCOMBLE
Publikováno v:
E-REA, Vol 15 (2017)
Headlinese, the language of English news headlines, stands out as a unique feature of the English-speaking press worldwide. Yet, as the age of the printing press fades away in favour of digital platforms, so does the way traditional news media reach
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/eb513b2bb03b47db912ebbe75041d096
Autor:
Florent Moncomble
Publikováno v:
Anglophonia, Vol 13, Pp 77-100 (2010)
Most interpretations of the absence of marked determiners in English are monolithic, insofar as they contend that all uses can be grouped under one heading, generally “zero article”. Some linguists argue that the expression “absence of article
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ad882a931e5a1689ad669bd1ea4a2980
https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.869
https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.869