Greater traditionalism predicts COVID-19 precautionary behaviors across 27 societies.

Autor: Samore T; Department of Anthropology, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. theo.samore@gmail.com., Fessler DMT; Department of Anthropology, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, Bedari Kindness Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA., Sparks AM, Holbrook C; Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, 95343, USA., Aarøe L; Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark., Baeza CG; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Barbato MT; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Barclay P; Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada., Berniūnas R; Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania., Contreras-Garduño J; Escuela Nacional de Estudio Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Unidad Morelia, 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico., Costa-Neves B; Lisbon Medical School, University of Lisbon, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal.; Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, 1749-002, Lisbon, Portugal., Del Pilar Grazioso M; Centro Integral de Psicología Aplicada, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.; Proyecto Aiglé Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Elmas P; Department of Psychology, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey., Fedor P; Department of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia., Fernandez AM; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Fernández-Morales R; Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Rafael Landivár, Guatemala City, 01016, Guatemala.; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Garcia-Marques L; CICPsi Research Center for Psychological Science, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.; School of Psychology, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal., Giraldo-Perez P; The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand., Gul P; Department of Sustainable Health, University of Groningen, Campus Fryslân, Groningen, The Netherlands., Habacht F; Division of Psychological Methodology, Department of Psychology and Psychodynamics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Hasan Y; Psychology Program, Department of Social Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar., Hernandez EJ; College of Arts and Sciences, Partido State University, Goa, 4422, Camarines Sur, Philippines., Jarmakowski T; Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100, Toruń, Poland., Kamble S; Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, 580003, India., Kameda T; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.; Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, 194-8610, Japan.; Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810, Japan., Kim B; Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea., Kupfer TR; Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK., Kurita M; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan., Li NP; School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 188065, Singapore., Lu J; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China., Luberti FR; Department of Psychology, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, P1B 8L7, Canada., Maegli MA; Department of Psychology, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala., Mejia M; Proyecto Aiglé Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Morvinski C; Department of Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel., Naito A; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan., Ng'ang'a A; Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada., de Oliveira AN; Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada., Posner DN; Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA., Prokop P; Department of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.; Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 06, Bratislava, Slovakia., Shani Y; Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel., Solorzano WOP; Department of Psychology, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala., Stieger S; Division of Psychological Methodology, Department of Psychology and Psychodynamics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Suryani AO; Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, 12930, Indonesia., Tan LKL; School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 188065, Singapore., Tybur JM; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands., Viciana H; Departamento de Filosofía y Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41018, Seville, Spain., Visine A; L'Institut Agro Montpellier, 34060, Montpellier, France., Wang J; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China., Wang XT; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China.

Publikováno v: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 Apr 11; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 4969. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 11.

Implications of instrumental and ritual stances for traditionalism-threat responsivity relationships.

Autor: Samore T; Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA theo.samore@gmail.comhttps://www.theosamore.com/., Fessler DMT; Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, and Department of Anthropology, Bedari Kindness Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAdfessler@anthro.ucla.eduhttp://www.danielmtfessler.com/.

Publikováno v: The Behavioral and brain sciences [Behav Brain Sci] 2022 Nov 10; Vol. 45, pp. e267. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 10.

Seeing the elephant: Parsimony, functionalism, and the emergent design of contempt and other sentiments

Autor: Gervais, MM, Fessler, DMT

Publikováno v: Gervais, MM; & Fessler, DMT. (2017). Seeing the elephant: Parsimony, functionalism, and the emergent design of contempt and other sentiments. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 40, e252. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001236. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6v81m8gx

The target article argues that contempt is a sentiment, and that sentiments are the deep structure of social affect. The 26 commentaries meet these claims with a range of exciting extensions and applications, as well as critiques. Most significantly,

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od_______325::ec85b6fafa5c250756e5ed8e65b7ce97
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6v81m8gx

Synchronized behavior increases assessments of the formidability and cohesion of coalitions

Autor: Fessler, DMT, Holbrook, C

Publikováno v: Fessler, DMT; & Holbrook, C. (2016). Synchronized behavior increases assessments of the formidability and cohesion of coalitions. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 37(6), 502-509. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.003. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8735n73h

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od_______325::10153b09420aaeef794b9517d2abcb46
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8735n73h

Confounds in moral/conventional studies

Autor: Quintelier, KJP, Fessler, DMT

Publikováno v: Philosophical Explorations, vol 18, iss 1
Quintelier, KJP; & Fessler, DMT. (2014). Confounds in moral/conventional studies. Philosophical Explorations. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2013.874496. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/07w836zv
Quintelier, KJP; & Fessler, DMT. (2015). Confounds in moral/conventional studies. Philosophical Explorations, 18(1), 58-67. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2013.874496. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/05x139k6

In 'The nature of moral judgments and the extent of the moral domain', Fraser (2012) criticises findings by Kelly et al. (2007) that speak against the moral/conventional (M/C) distinction, arguing that the experiment was confounded. First, we note th

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::28790d6e01a2ccdb426e6659ece050a1
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/07w836zv