The German national consensus on wound documentation and outcomes: Rationale, working programme and current status

Autor: Matthias Augustin, H. Schuster, M. Schindzielorz, C. Tonn, U. Imkamp, A. von Lienen, J. Bunse, R. Aschoff, M. May, B. Lange-Asschenfeldt, W. Vanscheidt, E. Valesky, Jochen Schmitt, R. U. Peter, F. Kamperhoff, T. Hirsch, T.R. Neubert, Christos C. Zouboulis, R. Kaufmann, S. Glau, M. Bischoff, S. Eming, H. Fansa, Kristina Heyer, A. Nast, B. Hartmann, Anke Mayer, R. Nagel, S. Gass, K. Waldvogel-Röcker, D. Hochlenert, H. Diener, T. Horn, T. Wild, T. Goerge, J. Helfrich, F. Flesch, M. Schmidt, S. Langer, C. van Montfrans, Eike Sebastian Debus, V. Großkopf, Kerstin Protz, Christine Blome, F. Gaiser, A.D. Niederbichler, M. Storck, Florian C. Beikert, T. Petzold, S. Gartner, Lisa Goepel, T. Eberlein, A. Sindrilaru, K. Scharffetter-Kochanek, C. Janetzko, E. Schäfer, C. Hampel-Kalthoff, Katharina Herberger, V. Gerber, W. Tigges, K.C. Münter, M. Jünger, J. Dissemond, J.O. Jost, A. Risse

Publikováno v: Wound Medicine. 7:8-13

Chronic wounds are of high socio-economic importance. Accurate and efficient treatment includes the use of outcomes measures in clinical care and in research. To date, consented standards for documentation of chronic wounds, agreements on interpretat

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4195c2e72dfac34875616492ced0d683
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wndm.2015.03.008