Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 177
pro vyhledávání: '"Evan Mayo-Wilson"'
Publikováno v:
Trials, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2024)
Abstract Equity and health equity are fundamental pillars in fostering a just and inclusive society. While equity underscores fairness in resource allocation and opportunity, health equity aims to eradicate avoidable health disparities among social g
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e78f8482aa044ffe9d2cb72786ef0a23
Autor:
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R. Pennington, Chase H. Harrison, Crystal N. Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S. Corker, Lisa M. Charron, Mahmoud Elsherif, Mario Malicki, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Sandra Grinschgl, Tess Neal, Thomas Rhys Evans, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, William L. D. Krenzer, Anabel Belaus, David Moreau, Debora I. Burin, Elizabeth Chin, Esther Plomp, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jared Lyle, Jonathan M. Adler, Julia G. Bottesini, Katherine M. Lawson, Kathleen Schmidt, Kyrani Reneau, Lars Vilhuber, Ludo Waltman, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Paul E. Plonski, Sakshi Ghai, Sean Grant, Thu-Mai Christian, William Ngiam, Moin Syed
Publikováno v:
Research Integrity and Peer Review, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024)
Abstract Journal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/030de849078a409fa345705b40f66493
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2023)
Abstract Guidance for systematic reviews of interventions recommends both benefits and harms be included. Systematic reviews may reach conclusions about harms (or lack of harms) that are not true when reviews include only some relevant studies, rely
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/497e0da7e4ee48f18b0630dd1cd174c1
Autor:
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher
Publikováno v:
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, Vol 46, Iss 112, Pp 1-12 (2022)
A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empr
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/24eb72df8184415195a01d167205764f
Publikováno v:
Royal Society Open Science, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2023)
The Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines provide a framework to help journals develop open science policies. Theories of behaviour change can guide understanding of why journals do (not) implement open science policies and the develop
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/28836061ceba4810a281458081a34cc1
Autor:
Evan Mayo-Wilson, Meredith L. Phillips, Avonne E. Connor, Kelly J. Vander Ley, Kevin Naaman, Mark Helfand
Publikováno v:
Research Integrity and Peer Review, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Abstract Background The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) is obligated to peer review and to post publicly “Final Research Reports” of all funded projects. PCORI peer review emphasizes adherence to PCORI’s Methodology Standar
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ea798983393c4588b1d795cdb22818e4
Autor:
Evan Mayo-Wilson, Sean Grant, Lauren Supplee, Sina Kianersi, Afsah Amin, Alex DeHaven, David Mellor
Publikováno v:
Research Integrity and Peer Review, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Abstract Background The Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines describe modular standards that journals can adopt to promote open science. The TOP Factor is a metric to describe the extent to which journals have adopted the TOP Guidelin
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/755c1abebf13462a960a18d0397e4849
Autor:
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f8d74c8b9e1c45f8b7273c3c9a9fbbc7
Publikováno v:
Trials, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019)
Abstract Background Adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials may be reported in multiple sources. Different methods for reporting adverse events across trials or across sources for a single trial may produce inconsistent information about the adverse
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c010aef4abc04642847a222e5fd1eae3
Autor:
Raju Kanukula, Matthew Page, Kerry Dwan, Simon Turner, Elizabeth Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Tianjing Li, Adya Misra, Steve McDonald, Andrew Forbes, Joanne McKenzie
Publikováno v:
F1000Research, Vol 10 (2021)
Background: Systematic reviews underpin clinical practice and policies that guide healthcare decisions. A core component of many systematic reviews is meta-analysis, which is a statistical synthesis of results across studies. Errors in the conduct an
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/13043dbf56f24b7a93c1bc51afb33b99